Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

106
Reports
29
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Land conversionclose
Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (2004)
States Parties: Philippines
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Land conversion
Danger List:  Yes
Rock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela (2012)
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Land conversion
Ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara (1996)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Land conversion
Other Threats: General poor state of conservation
Sun Temple, Konârak (2002)
States Parties: India
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Land conversion
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration and the structural instability
Sun Temple, Konârak (2000)
States Parties: India
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Land conversion
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration and the structural instability
Tipasa (2007)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Land conversion
Other Threats: Poor conservation conditons for the archeological remains
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Albania Algeria Bahrain Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Ghana India Lebanon Libya Mali Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Russian Federation Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Yemen
Threats
Land conversion 106

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top