State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Series of structural collapses at the property |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Nothofagus dieback |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Kiribati |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Significant decline of wildlife populations due to poaching |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures in relation with the Malindi port project; Natural disasters and lack of risk-preparedness |
States Parties
Côte d'Ivoire Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Italy Kiribati Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Financial resources 9
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.