State of Conservation
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Poor quality of the stone and weaknesses in the resistance; Cracks; Consolidation work is not undertaken |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1979 |
Document Source: | CC-79/CONF.015/4 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Structural issues, cracks |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1989 |
Document Source: | SC-89/CONF.004/12 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Threats
Earthquake 13
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.