State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | diminishing protection |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Fire |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings; Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions). |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings; Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | a) Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha nichesb) Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintingse) Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Illegal activities |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Cameroon Central African Republic China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Ghana Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Iraq Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Lithuania Madagascar Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Niger Oman Peru Philippines Poland Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Sri Lanka Turkmenistan Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Yemen ZimbabweThreats
Illegal activities 550
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.