Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

48
Reports
16
Properties concerned
16
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1996close
Threats* : Water infrastructureclose
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1988)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1988
Document Source: SC-88/CONF.001/4A,SC-88/CONF.007/13
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1987)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1986)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1985)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1984)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC-84/CONF.001/4,SC/84/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1983)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC/83/CONF.009/8
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary (1982)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 1982
Document Source: CLT-82/CONF.015/8
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Durmitor National Park (1993)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Durmitor National Park (1992)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Durmitor National Park (1985)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Durmitor National Park (1984)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC/84/CONF.004/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Everglades National Park (1996)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1995)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1994)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (1993)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (1987)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Other Threats: Fires
Ichkeul National Park (1996)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Ichkeul National Park (1989)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Ichkeul National Park (1987)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Ichkeul National Park (1986)
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Australia Bulgaria Canada Cuba Greece India Montenegro New Zealand Peru Senegal Serbia Tunisia United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
Threats
Water infrastructure 48

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top