Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park
Factors affecting the property in 2010*
- Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Lack of management structure and management plan
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2010
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2010**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2010
The State Party did not submit neither a state of conservation report nor copies of an adopted Management Plan, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009). Therefore the progress on the implementation of the decision is difficult to assess.
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies further note that the state of conservation report submitted by the State Party in 2009 did also not provide information on progress made on the development of the management plan for the site, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), although it did address other issues, notably conservation work carried out on individual buildings of the site.
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are concerned about the lack of information provided by the State Party and the lack of progress in meeting the requirement of the World Heritage Committee at the time of inscription of the property on the World Heritage List.
Summary of the interventions
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2010
34 COM 7B.69
Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park (India) (C 1101)
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add,
2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),
3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report and the adopted management plan as requested at its 31st and 33rd sessions;
4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2011, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the decision taken at the 33rd session, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011.
Draft Decision: 34 COM 7B.69
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add,
2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.70, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009),
3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report and the adopted management plan as requested at its 31st and 33rd sessions;
4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2011, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the decision taken at the 33rd session, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session in 2011.
IndiaExports
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
