Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Le Havre, the City Rebuilt by Auguste Perret

France
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Housing
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Housing (high rise tower)
  • Weakness of the planning and management systems in place
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

May-June 2023: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Advisory mission; March 2024: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

Between 2019 and 2023, a high-rise building was erected within the World Heritage property, without prior notification to the World Heritage Committee, as required by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines. An Advisory mission took place on 31 May and 1 June 2023 and provided a set of recommendations which were endorsed by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 45 COM 7B.184. On 26 January 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1181/documents/ and presents progress in the implementation of the above-mentioned Decision as follows:

  • The Heritage Code of 2016 defines the responsibilities of the different levels of public administration in the preservation of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of World Heritage properties;
  • The Local Urban Plan (PLU) is the main planning instrument at the municipal level, whilst the Remarkable Heritage Sites (SPR) are regulated by the rules for Architecture and Heritage Enhancement Areas (AVAP). Ensuring coherence between the AVAP and the provisions of the PLU is mandatory;
  • To strengthen the protection system, the State Party intends to modify the regulation of the SPR to provide a solid framework for existing exceptions by removing them in the perimeter of the World Heritage property and specifying them in the buffer zone. These modifications will be integrated into the updated PLU to ensure consistency. Deliberation for approval of these modifications is expected by spring 2025. The draft intercommunal PLU (PLUi) will integrate the above-mentioned changes and is scheduled for approval by the end of 2025;
  • Experiments with façade lighting will be presented to the Reactive Monitoring mission. No specific lighting display is envisaged for the Tour Alta and the only lights planned are for residential and functional purposes. To avoid the formation of a halo on the underside of the balconies, it has been requested that luminaires be positioned outside, away from the façade. The city of Le Havre, in consultation with the Architects of the Buildings of France (ABF) and the Regional Cultural Affairs Department (DRAC) intends to develop an urban study to re-consider the public spaces around the Tour, based on the recommendations of the Advisory mission. The outcomes of the study will be incorporated into the Management and Programming Guidelines of the PLU and, eventually, into the integrated PLUi;
  • Activities to improve the energy performance of existing buildings have been in place since the 1980s and will continue. The Urban Community of Le Havre Seine Metropole provides financial support to co-owners of listed buildings for their energy efficiency projects. With a view to preserving biodiversity, the SPR regulation encourages the preservation and increase of green spaces in the building blocks. With regard to public spaces, their management aims at rebalancing the urban ecosystems by increasing and diversifying the vegetation through the plan “Nature in the city” (Nature en ville).

A joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission was carried out from 27 to 28 March 2024, the report of which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1181/documents.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The State Party has announced steps to remedy the negative impacts of the Tour Alta and to strengthen the protection system to avoid the possibility of future projects with adverse impacts on the OUV of the property. These actions have not been implemented yet.

The 2024 Reactive Monitoring mission found that the main recommendations made to the State Party with the aim of improving the overall state of conservation of the property since the 2023 Advisory mission, have not yet been implemented. The analysis of the current system of protection and management reveals a challenging situation, particularly with regard to the requirements arising from the World Heritage status at the local level. In recent years, several important projects have been undertaken in the property and its buffer zone without informing the Committee as required by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines. Nor has the State Party systematically complied with the provisions of the Operational Guidelines on impact assessments. Furthermore, the protective function of the buffer zone is not guaranteed.

The State Party is committed to modifying the regulations of the SPR to strengthen the existing protection system of the property. However, as noted by the mission, the intention to allow a maximum height of 35 metres in a part of the buffer zone combined with the possibility of erecting buildings ‘with no maximum height’ in a main visual axis immediately behind the World Trade Centre would increase the vulnerability of the property, despite the fact that, in 2023, the World Heritage Committee noted with concern that the integrity of the property may no longer be guaranteed. It is thus suggested that the Committee request the State Party to exclude the possibility of buildings higher than 25 metres and seven storeys not only within the property but also in the entire buffer zone.

Regrettably, the mission found that the integration of the Tour Alta into the property appears to be problematic, due to its colour, its blind ground floor and the removal of the anticipated ‘visual permeability’ of the building. The announced urban planning study appears to be of strategic importance in order to partially mitigate the negative impact of the Tour Alta from an urban perspective. However, its mitigating potential is diminished by the ongoing project on the Place du Vieux Marché in the Notre-Dame district, which deviates from the Protection-Evolution Plan by making the public space predominantly plant-based rather than ‘mainly mineral’. The project was not notified to the World Heritage Centre as required by Paragraph 172 and its implementation shows a lack of compliance with the local system for the protection of the property.

The mission identified other projects that are likely to have an impact on one or more attributes underlying the OUV of the property. The World Heritage Committee may wish to request that project documentation be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by ICOMOS prior to any decision. The review of ongoing or new projects within the property also confirmed the need to strengthen the protection and management system of the property through a combined set of measures, including the systematic implementation of the Operational Guidelines on prior notification and Heritage Impact Assessments in accordance with Paragraphs 172 and 118bis respectively.

The mission also noted the challenges of restoring the concrete facades of the historic city blocks rebuilt by Auguste Perret, while seeking solutions to reduce their energy consumption, and provided ad hoc recommendations.

All of this confirms the increasing vulnerability of the property’s OUV-bearing attributes. The Reactive Monitoring mission has offered several essential measures to strengthen the property’s protection and improve its state of conservation, which the World Heritage Committee may wish to recommend to the State Party to fully implement in order to reduce the vulnerability of the property and ensure that its OUV can be maintained in the long term.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7B.6
Le Havre, the City rebuilt by Auguste Perret (France) (C 1181)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7B.184 adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Reminds the State Party of the need to inform it, through the World Heritage Centre, before making decisions that are difficult to reverse, of the intention to undertake or authorise, in an area protected by the Convention, major restorations or new constructions that could modify the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, as requested by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  4. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with the documentation on the following proposals mentioned during the 2024 Reactive Monitoring mission:
    1. The specifications for the urban planning study currently underway prior to the development of a project for a future World Trade Centre,
    2. The project currently underway on the site of the former École de Commerce and the proposed new water sports centre on the boulevard Clémenceau,
    3. Any other project which may affect the OUV of the property;
  5. Further request the State Party to implement as soon as possible the recommendations already made by the 2023 Advisory mission, in particular to promptly carry out the urban planning study of the Notre-Dame and Saint-François districts, including the area known as the ’Monumental Triangle‘, and to submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by ICOMOS, and in this regard, also requests the State Party:
    1. To pay particular attention to ensuring compliance with the Architecture and Heritage Enhancement Areas (AVAP) - Remarkable Heritage Sites (SPR) rules set out and specified in the Protection-Evolution Plan, in particular with regard to the Place du Vieux Marché,
    2. Not to amend the Protection-Evolution Plan to accommodate any new development that does not comply with it;
  6. Recommends that the State Party take into account the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, in particular the paragraphs on the role of the buffer zone and the wider setting, and the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL), when revising the SPR regulation;
  7. Strongly recommends the State Party to ensure that the revised planning document provides for the general maximum height rule for new buildings (25 metres and seven storeys) not only within the property, but also in its entire buffer zone, and removes the possibility of constructing buildings with no height limit in the axis of the monumental composition of the Bassin du Commerce;
  8. Further recommends that the State Party include, in extenso, in the planning and heritage legislation of the intercommunal Local Urban Plan (PLUi):
    1. Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines,
    2. The general rules (AVAP equivalent to SPR) regarding the architectural quality of new buildings to be erected within the perimetre of the property and its buffer zone;
  9. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit the final draft of the amended SPR document to the World Heritage Centre prior to its submission to the local SPR Commission, and then to bring it in its final approved form to the attention of the World Heritage Committee;
  10. Recommends moreover to the State Party to review the Management Plan for the property, following the revision of the SPR, and to ensure that it is consistent with maintaining the OUV of the property by:
    1. Taking into account the revised SPR,
    2. Incorporating certain provisions of the Operational Guidelines, particularly Paragraphs 112, 118bis and 172, and
    3. Ensuring that it is updated in the spirit of the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the HUL;
  11. Further requests the State Party to implement all other recommendations of the 2024 Reactive Monitoring mission and the 2023 Advisory mission;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7B.6

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7B.184, adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Reminds the State Party of the need to inform it, through the World Heritage Centre, before making decisions that are difficult to reverse, of the intention to undertake or authorise, in an area protected by the Convention, major restorations or new constructions that could modify the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, as requested by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  4. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with the documentation on the following proposals mentioned during the 2024 Reactive Monitoring mission:
    1. The specifications for the urban planning study currently underway prior to the development of a project for a future World Trade Centre,
    2. The project currently underway on the site of the former École de Commerce and the proposed new water sports centre on the boulevard Clémenceau,
    3. Any other project which may affect the OUV of the property;
  5. Further request the State Party to implement as soon as possible the recommendations already made by the 2023 Advisory mission, in particular to promptly carry out the urban planning study of the Notre-Dame and Saint-François districts, including the area known as the “Monumental Triangle”, and to submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by ICOMOS, and in this regard, also requests the State Party:
    1. To pay particular attention to ensuring compliance with the Architecture and Heritage Enhancement Areas (AVAP) - Remarkable Heritage Sites (SPR) rules set out and specified in the Protection-Evolution Plan, in particular with regard to the Place du Vieux Marché,
    2. Not to amend the Protection-Evolution Plan to accommodate any new development that does not comply with it;
  6. Recommends that the State Party take into account the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, in particular the paragraphs on the role of the buffer zone and the wider setting, and the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL), when revising the SPR regulation;
  7. Strongly recommends the State Party to ensure that the revised planning document provides for the general maximum height rule for new buildings (25 metres and seven storeys) not only within the property, but also in its entire buffer zone, and removes the possibility of constructing buildings with no height limit in the axis of the monumental composition of the Bassin du Commerce;
  8. Further recommends that the State Party include, in extenso, in the planning and heritage legislation of the intercommunal Local Urban Plan (PLUi):
    1. Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines,
    2. The general rules (AVAP equivalent to SPR) regarding the architectural quality of new buildings to be erected within the perimetre of the property and its buffer zone;
  9. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit the final draft of the amended SPR document to the World Heritage Centre prior to its submission to the local SPR Commission, and then to bring it in its final approved form to the attention of the World Heritage Committee;
  10. Recommends moreover to the State Party to review the Management Plan for the property, following the revision of the SPR, and to ensure that it is consistent with maintaining the OUV of the property by:
    1. Taking into account the revised SPR,
    2. Incorporating certain provisions of the Operational Guidelines, particularly Paragraphs 112, 118bis and 172, and
    3. Ensuring that it is updated in the spirit of the 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the HUL;
  11. Further requests the State Party to implement all other recommendations of the 2024 Reactive Monitoring mission and the 2023 Advisory mission;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 48th session.
Report year: 2024
France
Date of Inscription: 2005
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top