Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Roșia Montană Mining Landscape

Romania
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Mining
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Mining activities
  • Lack of planning controls / lack of management plan
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger

● Potential resumption of large scale open-caste gold mining

● Potential, cumulative impact of small-scale mining

● Water pollution from old mines

Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
Proposed and adopted by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 45 COM 7A.56
Corrective Measures for the property

Proposed and adopted by the World Heritage Committee in its Decision 45 COM 7A.56

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

Proposed for adoption in the draft Decision below

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

N/A

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 15 March 2024, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1552/documents/. The report outlines the progress made in addressing previous Committee decisions and the implementation of the corrective measures necessary to achieve the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR) adopted by the Committee in 2023, as follows:

  • Achieving the conditions necessary to halt all mining permits within the property has moved a step closer. On 8 March 2024, the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes dismissed a compensation claim brought by mining company Gabriel Resources against the Government of Romania on the grounds that the Government of Romania had violated the provisions of the agreements on the promotion and mutual guarantee of investments with the Governments of Canada and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in relation to mining rights. A challenge to annul the decision can be brought within a period of 120 days;
  • Measures to introduce planning controls to regulate mining and other negative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) are progressing; a cooperation agreement has been signed between the Ministry for Development, Public Works and Administration, the Municipality of Roșia Montană, the Alba County Council and the National Institute of Heritage, defining their specific roles in the elaboration and implementation of the General Urban Plan (PUG). The deadline for its completion and approval remains 2026;
  • The Management Committee became operational in October 2023;
  • The revision of the Management Plan of the property by the National Institute of Heritage, with input from the Management Committee, is expected to be finalised towards the end of 2024; this will reassess the Roman archaeological sites and establish conservation priorities;
  • Measures to address the discharge of polluted mine water are ongoing; a report on mitigation scenarios is expected later in 2024, and its outcomes will be reflected in the PUG, which is expected to be completed in 2026;
  • A risk situation at the Tăul Mare header pond in October 2022 highlighted the urgent need for an inspection and maintenance plan, which will be developed as part of the management plan by 2027.

The State Party also provided an update on the conservation and access work related to the 18th and 19th century houses within the property, which contribute to the well-being of the local community and support the presentation and interpretation of the property.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The decision by the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes on 8 March 2024 to dismiss Gabriel Resources’ arbitration claim paves the way for potentially significant progress in the implementation of corrective measures and is therefore to be welcomed. The dispute with the Government of Romania [regarding a mining project in Rosia Montana] dates back to 2019, before the property was inscribed on the World Heritage List [, and relates to the government’s decision in 2007 to annul Gabriel Resources’ mining permit]. As this arbitration claim was the main reason for the property’s inscription on the List of World Hertiage in Danger, if the claim had been successful, it would have opened up the possibility for mining to resume on the property.

It is understood that Gabriel Resources has the right to challenge the decision within 120 days from its announcement. As the State Party’s report was submitted almost immediately after the decision was issued, and thus before the 120-day period had expired, it offers no update on the timeframe for corrective measure 1, which relates to when the conditions necessary to halt the approval of all mining permits within the property will be in place.

It is encouraging that work on all other corrective measures is progressing in line with the approved timeframe. The activation of the Management Committee in 2023 (corrective measure 3) is to be welcomed, as is its input to the revision of the Management Plan (corrective measure 4), which is being led by the National Institute of Heritage. The Plan is expected to be completed by the end of 2024.

The proposed inclusion in the Management Plan of a reassessment of Roman archaeological sites to establish conservation priorities is also welcome. As identified in the Statement of OUV, these Roman sites, which encompass discrete sites, groups of sites and landscape features, are ‘prolific and pervasive’ across the landscape, forming ‘a socio‐technical mining landscape’ where ‘archaeological research will probably discover a large number of further surface and underground mining, ore processing and settlement sites of the Roman period’. A reassessment of these sites should provide a better understanding of their inter-relatedness and conservation requirements and form the basis for a wider interpretation of the property. It could also provide an opportunity to define an archaeological research strategy.

The operationalisation of the Management Committee has facilitated a cooperation agreement between the relevant stakeholders to define their specific roles in the elaboration and implementation of the PUG. Resources for the drafting of the PUG, including the necessary preliminary studies, have been secured by the Ministry for Development, Public Works and Administration and its completion is scheduled for 2026. The PUG is the key planning document required to prevent the approval of mining or any other activities that might impact negatively on the OUV (corrective measure 2).

Corrective measures 5 and 6 both relate to potential threats from polluted mine water, both underground and in header ponds. A report on mitigation scenarios for the former is expected later in 2024 and its recommendations will be reflected in the PUG, while work on the latter to develop an inspection and maintenance regime that can be incorporated into the Management Plan has not yet started but is programmed to be completed by 2027.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7A.2
Roșia Montană Mining Landscape (Romania) (C 1552rev)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7A.56 adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Welcomes the outcomes that the decision of the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes of 8 March 2024 to dismiss Gabriel Resources’ arbitration claim against the Government of Romania regarding the annulment of mining permits in 2007 may have on the state of conservation of the property;
  4. Notes that Gabriel Resources has the right to challenge the decision within 120 days, and requests the State Party to provide an update on this crucial mining issue as soon as it is able;
  5. Also welcomes the activation of the Management Committee (corrective measure 3) and progress with all other corrective measures according to the approved timeframe, in particular:
    1. Revision of the Management Plan, including a reassessment of the Roman archaeological sites in order to establish conservation priorities,
    2. Development of the General Urban Plan (PUG), a key planning document necessary to prevent mining or any other activities that might impact negatively on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property (corrective measure 2),
    3. Development of mitigation measures to address polluted underground mine water to be included in the PUG (corrective measure 5),
    4. Development of an inspection and maintenance regime for header ponds (corrective measure 6);
  6. Encourages the State Party to include in the Management Plan, as part of its reassessment of the Roman archaeological sites, an archaeological research plan to guide future work on existing sites and on future survey work to clarify what further surface and underground mining, ore processing and settlement sites of the Roman period remain;
  7. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property, including information on progress made in implementing corrective measures, and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  8. Decides to retain Roșia Montană Mining Landscape (Romania) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7A.2

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7A.56 adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Welcomes the outcomes that the decision of the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes of 8 March 2024 to dismiss Gabriel Resources’ arbitration claim against the Government of Romania regarding the annulment of mining permits in 2007 may have on the state of conservation of the property;
  4. Notes that Gabriel Resources has the right to challenge the decision within 120 days, and requests the State Party to provide an update on this crucial mining issue as soon as it is able;
  5. Also welcomes the activation of the Management Committee (corrective measure 3) and progress with all other corrective measures according to the approved timeframe, in particular:
    1. Revision of the Management Plan, including a reassessment of the Roman archaeological sites in order to establish conservation priorities,
    2. Development of the General Urban Plan (PUG), a key planning document necessary to prevent mining or any other activities that might impact negatively on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property (corrective measure 2),
    3. Development of mitigation measures to address polluted underground mine water to be included in the PUG (corrective measure 5),
    4. Development of an inspection and maintenance regime for header ponds (corrective measure 6);
  6. Encourages the State Party to include in the Management Plan, as part of its reassessment of the Roman archaeological sites, an archaeological research plan to guide future work on existing sites and on future survey work to clarify what further surface and underground mining, ore processing and settlement sites of the Roman period remain;
  7. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property, including information on progress made in implementing corrective measures, and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  8. Decides to retain Roșia Montană Mining Landscape (Romania) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2024
Romania
Date of Inscription: 2021
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Danger List (dates): 2021-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top