Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Baroque Churches of the Philippines

Philippines
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Ground transport infrastructure
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Proposed plan for building an ossuary to replace the original 159 crypt burials (issue resolved)
  • Need for long-term solution to control the flow of heavy rainwater (issue resolved)
  • Ground Transport Infrastructure (Proposed project to build the Binondo-Intramuros Bridge)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 2 (from 1997-1998)
Total amount approved : 27,000 USD
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 17 March 2023, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report along with the Revised Conservation Management Plan (CMP) of Intramuros, Archaeological and Heritage Impact Assessments (AIA/HIA) and Comprehensive Site Development Plan of the Binondo-Intramuros Bridge (BIB) project. The report is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/677/documents/. Progress with conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented as follows:

  • Construction of the BIB project commenced in 2019 and the bridge was inaugurated on 5 April 2022. It is located on the north edge of Intramuros, in the buffer zone of the property, approximately 550 m away from the San Agustin Church component of the property;
  • The revised HIA concluded that throughout the construction period and now that the project is completed, no immediate and direct physical impact has been observed, and the project has not caused any damage to San Agustin Church. However, the HIA highlights concerns that the larger volume of vehicular traffic will result in increased vibration and air pollution, which will have serious effects on the property.
  • Therefore, the HIA concluded that mitigation measures should be implemented to minimise adverse impacts and protect the attributes of the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), including its authenticity and integrity;
  • The CMP has not been revised, but additional information is provided, including a Traffic Management Plan (TMP), a Heritage Risk Assessment Plan for Intramuros, and Interpretation and Visitor Management Plans;
  • The revised Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) was conducted only through literature review, without additional archaeological excavation;
  • Regarding the proposed reconstruction of the Baluarte de Santo Domingo, the HIA indicates that there is no immediate plan to proceed in view of the impacts, including demolition of two historical buildings: Plaza Mexico and the Bureau of Immigration. However, the AIA indicates that the Baluarte de Santo Domingo is to be reconstructed;
  • Communication activities have been conducted with stakeholders and general public, and their engagement opportunities have been secured.

The State Party’s report also notes the findings of technical assessments, including the effects of earthquakes, particularly the 27 July 2022 north-western Luzon earthquake, and the associated recommendations.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

as requested by the Committee in Decision 43 COM 7B.74. Project documents, including the updated AIA, HIA and CMP, were submitted to the World Heritage Centre for further review by ICOMOS only after the completion of the project.

Despite the recommendations of the ICOMOS Technical Review, the AIA was only updated in a limited way, without archaeological excavation. Therefore, the BIB project may have impacted remains of the Baluarte de Santo Domingo and the Maestranza Wall.

Although the updated HIA concluded that no immediate and direct physical impact has been observed on San Agustin Church, including during the construction period, significant potential indirect and long-term impacts caused by growth in traffic volume are identified. Therefore, as recommended in the HIA, it is necessary to implement mitigation measures such as traffic rerouting, imposing vehicle load limits, removing the carpark in front of the church, closing the surrounding streets and roads of the property to vehicles, creating pedestrian areas, conducting structural assessments, and organizing regular monitoring and maintenance work to San Agustin Church and on its surrounding heritage assets that support the OUV of the property. The Committee may wish to request the State Party to submit the monitoring results to enable assessment of the effectiveness in mitigating adverse impacts on the OUV of the property.

The BIB stands on the perimeter of the buffer zone – Intramuros, and therefore, several surrounding assets have been visually affected. However, no mitigation measures for this effect presented, nor considered necessary in the HIA. Given that the BIB project is complete, the Committee may request the State Party to consider mitigation measures and submit a plan to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies. The Committee may also request the State Party to provide further information regarding a proposed larger heritage development plan for the Intendencia. The submitted documents provide inconsistent information regarding the reconstruction of the Baluarte de Santo Domingo. While the updated HIA sees difficulties considering its effect on Plaza Mexico and the Bureau of Immigration Building, the updated AIA indicates the possibility of reconstruction. The State Party might be invited to offer a clarification and should be reminded to inform the World Heritage Centre of proposals that may impact the OUV of the property, and to submit project documentation including an HIA, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, for review by the Advisory Bodies before making any decision that would be difficult to reverse.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.171
Baroque Churches of the Philippines (Philippines) (C 677bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.149 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the various communication activities with stakeholders and general public undertaken by the State Party;
  4. Notes with concern that the construction of Binondo-Intramuros Bridge (BIB) project was completed without change to its design and location nor consideration cancelling the project despite the Committee’s previous requests, and regrets that the State Party did not submit requested documentation for this project, including updated Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA), Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), and Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for review, as requested by the Committee, prior to construction works proceeding;
  5. Notes that the updated HIA concluded that no immediate and direct physical impact has been observed on San Agustin Church including during the construction period, but also notes with concern the significant potential indirect and long-term impacts arising from growth in traffic volume identified through the HIA process, and therefore requests the State Party to implement mitigation measures and to submit a report on these measures and monitoring results, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, in order to assess the effectiveness of mitigation against adverse impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  6. Regrets that the BIB has impacted the overall extended setting of the property in the buffer zone and extended setting of the property, and therefore also requests the State Party to consider further mitigation measures and submit a plan for implementing these measures to the World Heritage Centre for review by Advisory Bodies;
  7. Further requests the State Party to provide further information regarding the proposed, larger heritage development plan for the Intendencia and to clarify the current status of the potential reconstruction of the Baluarte de Santo Domingo, and reminds the State Party to inform the World Heritage Centre of any project that may impact the OUV of the property, and to submit project documentation including an HIA, for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, before making any decision that would be difficult to reverse, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.171

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.149, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the various communication activities with stakeholders and general public undertaken by the State Party;
  4. Notes with concern that the construction of Binondo-Intramuros Bridge (BIB) project was completed without change to its design and location nor consideration cancelling the project despite the Committee’s previous requests, and regrets that the State Party did not submit requested documentation for this project, including updated Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA), Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), and Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for review, as requested by the Committee, prior to construction works proceeding;
  5. Notes that the updated HIA concluded that no immediate and direct physical impact has been observed on San Agustin Church including during the construction period, but also notes with concern the significant potential indirect and long-term impacts arising from growth in traffic volume identified through the HIA process, and therefore requests the State Party to implement mitigation measures and to submit a report on these measures and monitoring results, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, in order to assess the effectiveness of mitigation against adverse impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  6. Regrets that the BIB has impacted the overall extended setting of the property in the buffer zone and extended setting of the property, and therefore also requests the State Party to consider further mitigation measures and submit a plan for implementing these measures to the World Heritage Centre for review by Advisory Bodies;
  7. Further requests the State Party to provide further information regarding the proposed, larger heritage development plan for the Intendencia and to clarify the current status of the potential reconstruction of the Baluarte de Santo Domingo, and reminds the State Party to inform the World Heritage Centre of any project that may impact the OUV of the property, and to submit project documentation including an HIA, for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, before making any decision that would be difficult to reverse, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.

Report year: 2023
Philippines
Date of Inscription: 1993
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2023) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top