Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Aapravasi Ghat

Mauritius
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Commercial development
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Restoration works (issue resolved)
  • Visitor pressure (issue resolved)
  • Management systems/Management Plan (need for an updated Management Plan)
  • Urban development (issue resolved)
  • Commercial development
  • Transport infrastructure
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 2 (from 2014-2023)
Total amount approved : 59,200 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

March 2012: ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; May 2018: Joint UNESCO/ICOMOS Advisory mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 31 December 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1227/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented in this report, as follows:

  • The archival survey of the Parc à Boulets in the buffer zone has been completed and a copy was included in the State Party’s report. An archaeological survey should be completed by the second quarter of 2023 and the report on its findings will be submitted to the Committee;
  • In regard to the buffer zone developments, an overarching Heritage Impact Assessment and Visual Impact Assessment (HIA/VIA) was completed by independent consultants in November 2022. The process included stakeholder engagement. The overarching HIA/VIA is currently under consideration by the State Party;
  • No construction has commenced on any of the projects in the buffer zone considered in the overarching HIA/VIA;
  • Individual HIA/VIAs will be conducted on the individual projects within the framework of the overarching HIA/VIA:
    • Redevelopment of the Granary building and associated infrastructure,
    • Redevelopment, modernisation and operation of the Immigration Square Urban Terminal at Port Louis,
    • The Metro Express project and end station at the Immigration Square,
    • The Intercontinental Slavery Museum,
    • The Beekrumsing Ramlallah Interpretation Centre – Phase II,
    • Upgrading/ Reconstruction of the Fish, Meat and Poultry Section of the Central Market at Port Louis,
    • Public Walkway project,

  • In regard to stakeholder engagement and management, a Consultative Committee, as provided for under the Planning Policy Guidance 6, which is comprised of 96 members from the local community and governmental institutions is functioning. This platform will be further developed as a platform that will facilitate more frequent and comprehensive stakeholder consultations;
  • A Management Plan Committee (MPC), established under the provisions of the Management Plan 2020-2025, is likewise functioning to monitor the implementation of the Management Plan, including and not limited to Action Area Plan 1 for the buffer zone and assesses HIAs and VIAs, amongst others.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The State Party has made much progress in improving the protection and management of this property over the last couple of years. Commitment to the overarching HIA/VIA process is commendable as is its commitment to complete individual HIAs and VIAs on the component projects.

The Committee may wish to request the State Party to submit the individual HIA/VIAs with the designs that they assess for review by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies before the conclusions of the HIAs and VIAs are adopted.

The State Party’s further reports of its stakeholder engagement mechanisms and management structure are likewise welcome, as is the submission of the archival survey of the Parc à Boulets and the commitment to forward to the Committee a report on the foreseen archaeological survey.

Due to the scale of the development proposal in the buffer zone of the property and the complexity of the impact assessment process required to safeguard the property’s Outstanding Universal Value, it is recommended that the State Party should be requested to submit a state of conservation report in December 2024.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.128
Aapravasi Ghat (Mauritius) (C 1227)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.119 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Commends the State Party for the improvements that it has made in the protection and management of the property, notes with appreciation the State Party’s reports on its institutional structures for stakeholder consultation and requests the State Party keep it informed of further steps taken to facilitate more frequent comprehensive stakeholder consultation;
  4. Also notes the submission of the archival survey on the Parc à Boulets, further notes the State Party’s commitment to submit the results of the archaeological survey to the World Heritage Centre and also requests that the State Party submit the outcomes of the archaeological survey to the World Heritage Centre to be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies;
  5. Notes furthermore with appreciation, the progress made on the overarching Heritage Impact Assessment and Visual Impact Assessment for the project in the buffer zone, the State Party’s commitment to continuing the dialogue with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies and the submission of the outcomes of these assessments to the World Heritage Centre to be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.128

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.119, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Commends the State Party for the improvements that it has made in the protection and management of the property, notes with appreciation the State Party’s reports on its institutional structures for stakeholder consultation and requests the State Party keep it informed of further steps taken to facilitate more frequent comprehensive stakeholder consultation;
  4. Also notes the submission of the archival survey on the Parc à Boulets, further notes the State Party’s commitment to submit the results of the archaeological survey to the World Heritage Centre and also requests that the State Party submit the outcomes of the archaeological survey to the World Heritage Centre to be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies;
  5. Notes furthermore with appreciation, the progress made on the overarching Heritage Impact Assessment and Visual Impact Assessment for the project in the buffer zone, the State Party’s commitment to continuing the dialogue with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies and the submission of the outcomes of these assessments to the World Heritage Centre to be reviewed by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Finally equests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Report year: 2023
Mauritius
Date of Inscription: 2006
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top