Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Byblos

Lebanon
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition
  • Housing
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Port expansion project (issue resolved)
  • Need for a Management Plan and a Master Plan (issue resolved)
  • Plans for an extension of the jetty (issue resolved)
  • Tourism infrastructure: “Diplomatic Club” project with above ground structures of reinforced concrete built at the south of the property on potentially archaeologically sensitive grounds
  • Management systems/ management plan: Unclear boundary definition of property and buffer zone
  • Erosion and siltation/ deposition: Environmental risks - coastal erosion of the Byblos mound due to the heavy tidal impact of the sea.
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 1 (from 1999-1999)
Total amount approved : 10,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2021**

1995, 1997, 1998 and 2001: Different missions for the evaluation of the state of conservation and project execution in Lebanon, including Byblos; November 2001: ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; September 2006: UNESCO expert mission to Lebanon; February 2017: World Heritage Centre mission; 2018: UNESCO/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 4 March 2021, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/295/documents. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented, as follows:

  • All works on the ‘Diplomatic Club’ beach resort project adjacent to the archaeological area have been stopped, and no further archaeological investigations conducted on this private property since the execution of the project was suspended in April 2017;
  • Conservation and consolidation of the excavated remains are priority maintenance measures, focusing on archaeological features at risk and the removal of harmful vegetation;
  • A vegetation management plan is being elaborated with the ‘Nature Conservation Center’ of the American University of Beirut to promote endemic plants and to control species that might pose a threat to the archaeological remains;
  • Detailed documentation activities are being carried out including topographic and architectural surveys with the use of laser scan technology;
  • Refurbishment and restoration of two historic buildings at the archaeological sites foreseen for site management offices and museum functions had to be postponed due to the economic crisis;
  • Within the Historic City adjacent to the archaeological site, the new Centre for Research and Conservation of Lebanese Cultural Heritage (CRCPL) has been fully equipped and has become operational with activities taking place.

The State Party reports that the country has been seriously affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing economic crisis, and therefore all major interventions in the archaeological site have stopped.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

The opening of the new CRCPL is acknowledged, and it is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to organise further capacity building activities in order to develop the Centre as an internationally-acknowledged research and educational facility on archaeological conservation and management practices.

It is recalled that the ‘Diplomatic Club’ beach resort project was originally proposed as an ecotourism project with park-like landscaping and some recreational facilities on private land. The World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS supported the principle of this proposal as it would have produced desirable ecological and archaeological outcomes, preserving attributes reflecting the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, while helping to separate the property from nearby beachfront tourism activities in the southern part of the World Heritage property, for which no clear boundaries or buffer zones have been established to date.

The 2018 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission ascertained that significant incremental changes had been made to the initial project design that would create a large tourism facility, which would consume natural resources and therefore not be consistent with the original ecotourism concept, nor provide a buffer from nearby tourism activities. Therefore, the activities raised the concern of the Committee, which requested the State Party to suspend the construction works and allow a thorough archaeological investigation to clarify the existence of evidence that may reflect the property’s OUV, such as that relating to a Phoenician port facility, which would be an archaeological site of great importance directly related to the ancient city of Byblos.

It is considered that the Committee’s previous request to suspend the project in its current and unrevised form continues to be justified. In addition, further excavation would be required to determine whether any material remains, particularly in the deeper archaeological strata, are associated with the ancient port of Byblos. The State Party has indicated that the project and the archaeological investigations that needed to be undertaken prior to the continuation of the works have been suspended. Given the potential impact that a project in the area may have on the OUV of the property, it is crucial that any future project planned in this area is preceded by  a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared in accordance with the 2011 ICOMOS Guidelines, taking into account the results of the archaeological investigations into the nature and extent of the archaeological features.

In 2019, a boundary clarification proposal relating to the extent of the property at the time of inscription was submitted by the State Party, who is currently undertaking its review based on feedback by the World Heritage Centre.

It is recommended that the Committee reiterate its request to the State Party to revise the boundary of the property, including a buffer zone, and to develop a minor boundary modification proposal in consultation with the Advisory Bodies.

The issues addressed by the 2018 mission remain relevant and it is recommended that the Committee urge the State Party to implement the mission’s recommendations, including those addressing the conservation and management of the property, possible synergies with other UNESCO conventions, and the need for a sustainable tourism plan. The preparation of a plan for the management of the property's natural resources is considered an important step forward in establishing sustainable site maintenance practices adapted to the harsh environmental conditions that prevail at the property.

The World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies understand the difficulties faced by the States Party due to the COVID-19 pandemic and economic situation. It is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to request International Assistance in order to address pending issues, such as the elaboration of the Management Plan and other management tools.

It is further recommended that the Committee request the State Party to inform it, through the World Heritage Centre, of any future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the OUV of the property, in accordance with paragraph 172 of Operational Guidelines, before decisions are made that would be difficult to reverse.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7B.130
Byblos (Lebanon) (C 295)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 42 COM 7B.56 and 43 COM 7B.48, adopted at its 42nd (Manama, 2018) and 43rd (Baku, 2019) sessions respectively,
  3. Acknowledges that the Centre for Research and Conservation of Lebanese Cultural Heritage has become operational, and encourages the State Party to carry out further capacity building activities in order to develop the centre as an internationally-acknowledged research and educational facility on archaeological conservation and management practices;
  4. Notes that all works on the ‘Diplomatic Club’ touristic beach resort project adjacent to the property have been suspended, as requested in its previous Decision, and that no further archaeological investigations have been conducted since;
  5. Reiterates its concern that the project in its current form is not suitable, and also notes that any enhancement of the direct surroundings of the archaeological area must ensure appropriate environmental and archaeological outcomes for the World Heritage property, and that any project planned adjacent to the excavated areas should be subject to a Heritage Impact Assessment prior to any construction;
  6. Also notes the efforts of the State Party to clarify the extent of the property at the time of inscription, and requests the State Party, in consultation with the Advisory Bodies, to elaborate and submit a Minor Boundary Modification, in line with Paragraphs 107 and 164 and Annex 11 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Urges the State Party to implement the recommendations of the 2018 mission report, with particular attention to the following:
    1. Exploring synergies with the UNESCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage,
    2. Developing a management plan with provisions for sustainable tourism, conservation activities, and regular maintenance,
    3. Establishing a national data management strategy that ensures making documentation and inventory information available for site management and research at the local level,
    4. Considering the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach for integrating the management plan with the urban development for the old town of Byblos;
  8. Also encourages the State Party to submit an International Assistance request to support efforts in the elaboration of needed management tools;
  9. Invites the State Party to inform the Committee, through the World Heritage Centre, of any future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  10. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session.
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7B.130

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 42 COM 7B.56 and 43 COM 7B.48, adopted at its 42nd (Manama, 2018) and 43rd (Baku, 2019) sessions respectively,
  3. Acknowledges that the Centre for Research and Conservation of Lebanese Cultural Heritage has become operational, and encourages the State Party to carry out further capacity building activities in order to develop the centre as an internationally-acknowledged research and educational facility on archaeological conservation and management practices;
  4. Notes that all works on the ‘Diplomatic Club’ touristic beach resort project adjacent to the property have been suspended, as requested in its previous Decision, and that no further archaeological investigations have been conducted since;
  5. Reiterates its concern that the project in its current form is not suitable, and also notes that any enhancement of the direct surroundings of the archaeological area must ensure appropriate environmental and archaeological outcomes for the World Heritage property, and that any project planned adjacent to the excavated areas should be subject to a Heritage Impact Assessment prior to any construction;
  6. Also notes the efforts of the State Party to clarify the extent of the property at the time of inscription, and requests the State Party, in consultation with the Advisory Bodies, to elaborate and submit a Minor Boundary Modification, in line with Paragraphs 107 and 164 and Annex 11 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Urges the State Party to implement the recommendations of the 2018 mission report, with particular attention to the following:
    1. Exploring synergies with the UNESCO 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage,
    2. Developing a management plan with provisions for sustainable tourism, conservation activities, and regular maintenance,
    3. Establishing a national data management strategy that ensures making documentation and inventory information available for site management and research at the local level,
    4. Considering the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach for integrating the management plan with the urban development for the old town of Byblos;
  8. Also encourages the State Party to submit an International Assistance request to support efforts in the elaboration of needed management tools;
  9. Invites the State Party to inform the Committee, through the World Heritage Centre, of any future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  10. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session in 2023.
Report year: 2021
Lebanon
Date of Inscription: 1984
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2021) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top