Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Champagne Hillsides, Houses and Cellars

France
Factors affecting the property in 2018*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Renewable energy facilities
  • Other Threats:

    Lack of measures to protect or to restore the biodiversity of the landscape

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Threats identified at the time of inscription in 2015:

  • Lack of updated calendar for the finalisation of the protection designations currently being established
  • Lack of an Heritage Impact Assessment for the wind farm projects of Pocancy-Champigneul
  • Need for a comprehensive study on the structural behaviour of the quarries in the Saint-Nicaise Hill
  • Need to identify relevant indicators for the assessment of the state of conservation of the property, and to define an appropriate periodicity of measurement for each of them
  • Lack of measures to protect or to restore the biodiversity of the landscape
  • Potential projects located within the Mercier House estate at the south of the Place de la République
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2018
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2018**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2018

Following a progress report (requested at the time of inscription of the property in 2015) submitted on 30 November 2016, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report on 29 November 2017, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1465/documents/, and reports the following:

  • Several protection instruments underway at the time of inscription have either been introduced or are undergoing finalization, namely the site classé of the Champagne hillsides of the municipalities of Aÿ, Champillon, Cumières, Damery, Dizy, Hautvillers, Mareuil-sur-Aÿ, Mutigny and Saint Imoges, enacted by ministerial decree on 2 June 2016;
  • Law n°2016-925 of 7 July 2016 on creativity, architecture and heritage modifies previous protection instruments – including Secteurs sauveguardés, areas for enhancement of architecture and heritage (AVAP), and zones for the protection of architectural, urban and landscape heritage (ZPPAUP) – creating remarkable heritage sites (SPRs). SPRs shall be managed through safeguarding and enhancement plans (PSMV), plans for the enhancement of architecture and heritage (PVAP) or through AVAP regulations;
  • The Aÿ, Hautvillers and Mareuil-sur-Aÿ AVAP received final validation by relevant municipal councils on 30 March 2016. Reims Municipal Council adopted the Saint-Nicaise Hill AVAP on 14 November 2016, and launched the creation of a Secteur sauvegardé for Reims on 1 February 2016. The site’s historic study ended in October 2017, while the delineation of its perimeters is expected by July 2018 and the finalisation of its PSMV in 2020. Feedback from the Regional Commission for Architecture and Heritage on transforming the ZPPAUP for Avenue de Champagne à Epernay into an SPR is expected in the first half of 2018;
  • A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) of the windfarm located near Pocancy and Champigneul, and its cumulative impact with the Thibie windfarm on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), was completed by state services in March 2016. It concluded that protection of OUV could not be guaranteed; consequently, the Marne Prefecture refused the project’s building permit. The proponents have appealed against this decision and the case will be decided in 2018. Study of a forthcoming Landscape Influence Area will guide future decisions on the location of windfarms;
  • Monitoring campaigns were realised concerning underground cellars in Reims, giving positive conclusions. Nevertheless, the municipality has requested the Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) to implement further studies, with the first results expected in 2020;
  • Efforts are ongoing to align monitoring indicators, including those recently introduced that relate to state of conservation activities, management efficacy, and the planning system, with those developed by the World Heritage Centre;
  • Recovery of the vineyards’ biodiversity is ensured through sustainable agro-practices, preserving agro-ecological infrastructure, and tending to the hillsides’ landscape;
  • No projects or building permits have ultimately been implemented in the Mercier House estate, which is regulated by AVAP so as to ensure control over any future transformation.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2018

The State Party has made significant advancements in addressing all the Committee’s recommendations. The enactment of the site classé and the final validation of the AVAP for Aÿ, Hautvillers and Mareuil-sur-Aÿ are worth mentioning, as well as the ongoing preparation of the AVAP for Saint-Nicaise and new Secteur sauvegardé in Reims.

It is recommended that the Committee commend the State Party for the dedication and the rigorous methodology of its state services in assessing and explaining the potential negative impacts of the proposed windfarm of Pocancy and Champigneul on the property’s OUV, and the consequent decision by the Marne Prefecture to refuse the project’s building permit. The methodology appears robust and the assessment valid.  It is important to note that the methodology developed is considered useful for impact assessments concerning other World Heritage properties in France. The initiation of the study on the underground system of cavities is welcomed as a necessary preliminary step for the Risk Management Plan. Consolidating the indicators already in use within the property and those envisaged in the nomination dossier represents a useful first step to link these indicators with management objectives.

Information on the activities for the safeguarding of biodiversity is welcome: these should be integrated into everyday farming activities in order to produce their expected results.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2018
42 COM 7B.22
Champagne Hillsides, Houses and Cellars (France) (C 1465)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/18/42.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 8B.24, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Welcomes the ongoing progress made by the State Party in strengthening the legal, planning and management framework of the property;
  4. Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts in addressing the Committee recommendations, paying special attention to the following:
    1. Finalize the “Aires de valeur de l’architecture et du patrimoine” (AVAP) for Saint-Nicaise Hill and the Secteur sauvegardé for Reims with the plans and regulations currently under elaboration,
    2. Finalize the revision of the planning instruments so that their planning provisions are coherent with the regulations and plans for the newly-created protected zones,
    3. Finalize the study on the underground system of caves in Reims and develop the envisaged Risk Mananagement Plan according to the guide presented in annexe 11 of the state of conservation report submitted by the State Party in Novembre 2017,
    4. Continue the study on the landscape influence area undertaken in the framework of the impact assessments of the windfarm of Pocancy and Champigneul;
  5. Commending the State Party for the rigorous analysis of the negative impacts of the planned windfarm in Pocancy and Champigneul and its consistent decision-making, concurs with the conclusions of the assessment carried out by the French authorities regarding the negative impacts of this infrastructure on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed about the outcome of the appeal against the decision;
  6. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2019, an updated report on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies.
Draft Decision: 42 COM 7B.22

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/18/42.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 8B.24, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Welcomes the ongoing progress made by the State Party in strengthening the legal, planning and management framework of the property;
  4. Encourages the State Party to continue its efforts in addressing the Committee recommendations, paying special attention to the following:
    1. Finalize the “Aires de valeur de l’architecture et du patrimoine” (AVAP) for Saint-Nicaise Hill and the Secteur sauvegardé for Reims with the plans and regulations currently under elaboration,
    2. Finalize the revision of the planning instruments so that their planning provisions are coherent with the regulations and plans for the newly-created protected zones,
    3. Finalize the study on the underground system of caves in Reims and develop the envisaged Risk Mananagement Plan according to the guide presented in annexe 11 of the state of conservation report submitted by the State Party in Novembre 2017,
    4. Continue the study on the landscape influence area undertaken in the framework of the impact assessments of the windfarm of Pocancy and Champigneul;
  5. Commending the State Party for the rigorous analysis of the negative impacts of the planned windfarm in Pocancy and Champigneul and its consistent decision-making, concurs with the conclusions of the assessment carried out by the French authorities regarding the negative impacts of this infrastructure on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed about the outcome of the appeal against the decision;
  6. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2019, an updated report on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies.
Report year: 2018
France
Date of Inscription: 2015
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2017) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 42COM (2018)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top