Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park

Viet Nam
Factors affecting the property in 2016*
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Illegal activities
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Negative impacts of a road construction project in the World Heritage site
  • Illegal logging and forest crimes
  • Lack of a visitor Management Plan
  • Cable car project to provide access to the Son Doong cave
  • Inadequate Sustainable Tourism Development Plan
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2016
Requests approved: 2 (from 2005-2011)
Total amount approved : 29,240 USD
Missions to the property until 2016**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2016

The State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the Committee in Decision 39 COM 8B.6 (Bonn, 2015).

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2016

In the absence of a report from the State Party, it is not possible to evaluate progress achieved in addressing the concerns raised by the Committee at its 39th session in 2015.

It should be recalled that in its evaluation of the property’s renomination and extension in 2015, IUCN noted that the proposed construction of a cable car to provide access to the Son Doong cave within the strictly protected zone of the property would constitute a significant development, likely to have negative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property. While recent media reports dated February and April 2016 suggest that plans for the cable car are still being considered, their status is unclear and an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) does not appear to have been developed yet. It is recommended that the Committee reiterate its concern about the proposed construction of the Son Doong Cave cable car and that it urge again the State Party to complete an EIA in line with IUCN’s World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment prior to a decision on the implementation of any tourism development projects, and to ensure that development proposals are not permitted if they would negatively impact the OUV of the property. It is also recommended that the Committee reiterate its request to the State Party to revise the property’s Sustainable Tourism Development Plan to include the property extension and ensure an integrated and environmentally sensitive approach to tourism that ensures visitor use remains compatible with the OUV of the property.

Although the 2015 IUCN evaluation recognized that efforts to halt poaching are increasing, it also considered that illegal logging and poaching of wildlife are ongoing threats, and that there is a need for more systematic monitoring of enforcement activities. As the 2015 IUCN evaluation noted a decline in sightings of a number of large mammal species, up-to-date data is urgently needed to confirm the population status of large mammals including tiger, Asiatic black bear, Asian elephant, giant muntjac, Asian wild dog, gaur, and the recently discovered saola. It is therefore recommended that the Committee reiterate its request in that regard, and that it also request the State Party to provide data on the results of its law enforcement activities to address illegal logging and poaching.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2016
40 COM 7B.91
Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park (Viet Nam) (N 951bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 8B.6, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the Committee;
  4. Reiterates its concern about proposals to construct a cable car to provide access to the Son Doong cave within the strictly protected zone of the property and the potential impacts this may have on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), and urges again the State Party to complete Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), in line with IUCN’s Advice Note on Environmental Assessment, prior to a decision on the implementation of any tourism development projects and to ensure that development proposals are not permitted if they would negatively impact the OUV of the property;
  5. Reiterates its requests to the State Party to:
    1. Revise the property’s Sustainable Tourism Development Plan to include the property extension and ensure an integrated and environmentally sensitive approach to tourism that ensures visitor use remains compatible with the OUV of the property,
    2. Submit to the World Heritage Centre updated data on the population status of key large mammal species, including tiger, Asiatic black bear, Asian elephant, giant muntjac, Asian wild dog, gaur and saola;
  6. Requests the State Party to provide data on the results of its law enforcement activities to address illegal logging and poaching;
  7. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 41st session in 2017.
Draft Decision: 40 COM 7B.91

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 8B.6, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the Committee;
  4. Reiterates its concern about proposals to construct a cable car to provide access to the Son Doong cave within the strictly protected zone of the property and the potential impacts this may have on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), and urges again the State Party to complete Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), in line with IUCN’s Advice Note on Environmental Assessment, prior to a decision on the implementation of any tourism development projects and to ensure that development proposals are not permitted if they would negatively impact the OUV of the property;
  5. Reiterates its requests to the State Party to:
    1. Revise the property’s Sustainable Tourism Development Plan to include the property extension and ensure an integrated and environmentally sensitive approach to tourism that ensures visitor use remains compatible with the OUV of the property,
    2. Submit to the World Heritage Centre updated data on the population status of key large mammal species, including tiger, Asiatic black bear, Asian elephant, giant muntjac, Asian wild dog, gaur and saola;
  6. Requests the State Party to provide data on the results of its law enforcement activities to address illegal logging and poaching;
  7. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2017, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 41st session in 2017.
Report year: 2016
Viet Nam
Date of Inscription: 2003
Category: Natural
Criteria: (viii)(ix)(x)
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 40COM (2016)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top