Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Old Towns of Djenné

Mali
Factors affecting the property in 2007*
  • Housing
  • Land conversion
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Solid waste
  • Other Threats:

    Housing dilapidation

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

a) No management and conservation plan;

b) Urban development pressure;

c) Housing dilapidation;

d) Waste management problem;

e) Encroachment of archaeological sites

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2007

Total amount allocated to the property: USD 85,000 (Italian Funds-in-Trust with UNESCO)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2007
Requests approved: 2 (from 1981-2007)
Total amount approved : 37,977 USD
Missions to the property until 2007**

2002, 2005, World Heritage Centre missions; 2006, World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2007

Following Decision 29 COM 7B.36, a World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM mission visited the World Heritage property in 2006 to assess the state of conservation of the property and propose solutions to ease urban development pressure and to make recommendations to the Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006). The mission confirmed that the World Heritage property was suffering from intense urban development pressure, which was threatening the integrity of the overall earthen architecture and archaeology of the city and for which urgent development and management measures were needed. The mission made the following recommendations:

a) Prepare an accurate map of the boundaries of the World Heritage property;

b) Establish urban and planning regulatory tools developed through a participative approach;

c) Create a buffer zone;

d) Prepare urgently both management and conservation plans, to include archaeological sites.

At the 30th session (Vilnius, 2006), the Committee requested the State Party to undertake all necessary measures to implement the recommendations of the mission; encouraged the State Party to submit a request for international assistance for the preparation of a management plan; and also encouraged the State Party to define a project aiming at identifying and promoting good practices in house rehabilitation and adaptation of traditional architecture for modern uses.

In its report submitted in January 2007, the State Party has provided details of a specific project initiated by the Ministry for the Culture of Mali and Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde, Leiden. Under the second and final phase, 2005-2006, 30 houses have been restored in the tourist areas of the city; adding to the 100 houses restored in the first phase from 1997 to 2003.

The report further outlines many ongoing threats to the site connected to the lack of resources amongst the local inhabitants to carry out regular maintenance of buildings, inappropriate service installation (such as 58 new water fountains which add to water pollution in the streets), inappropriate work in streets carried out without authorization by the municipal authority; use of inappropriate materials such as burnt bricks, cement, metal windows and doors; plundering and illicit traffic of cultural goods, ‘anarchic’ urbanization, and encroachment on archeological sites, all projecting a situation that is dire and not under control.

The State Party reported that an international assistance request had been submitted for funds to develop a Management and Conservation Plan. As a preliminary to this, an initial meeting to launch work on a Management Plan had been held for all relevant stakeholders on July 13, 2006. This meeting was said to have created a bond between those present but that more efforts were needed to bring about strong support for the ideals of management and conservation. No details are provided on the process to be followed to develop a management plan, nor a timetable. In order to address how the existing buildings might provide acceptable homes relevant for the 21st century and be maintained in line with the residents’ requirements, ICOMOS and World Heritage Centre consider that the Management and Conservation Plan will need to address far more than the fabric of the building and does in effect need to be a sustainable development plan for the Old City. A synopsis of this plan needs to be developed as soon as possible.

Finally, the report does not address the three remaining areas of work identified by the mission, namely boundaries, regulatory tools, and buffer zone. ICOMOS and World Heritage Centre are concerned that no details are provided as to how the other mission recommendations are to be addressed. Given the short timeframe since the last Committee meeting, no firm actions could be expected, but it would have been desirable for a timeframe to have been provided for when these matters would receive attention. In the face of the continuing major deterioration of the fragile urban fabric, as acknowledged by the State Party, there is an urgent need for an action plan to set out how the structural problems identified by the mission might be addressed, and for which donor support might be sought. With the approval of the international assistance in November 2006 the State Party could use the opportunity of the elaboration of the management plan to address some of these other issues.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2007
31 COM 7B.51
Old Towns of Djenné (Mali)

The World Heritage Committee,

1.       Having examined Document WHC-07/31.COM/7B,

2.       Recalling Decision 30 COM 7B.38, adopted during its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006),

3.       Noting that the request for international assistance for the preparation of a management plan submitted by the State Party has been approved in November 2006,

4.       Expresses its concern that little progress has been made to set out how the recommendations of the 2006 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM mission might be addressed,

5.       Urges the State Party urgently to provide details for the scope and the timetable for the elaboration of the Management and Conservation Plan,

6.       Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre, before 1 February 2008, with a state of conservation report of the property and progress achieved in the implementation of a management and conservation plan, delineation of boundaries, creation of a buffer zone and establishment of regulatory tools, for examination by the Committee at its 32nd session in 2008.

Draft Decision: 30 COM 7B.51

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-07/31.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decision 30 COM 7B.38, adopted during its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006),

3. Noting that the request for international assistance for the preparation of a management plan submitted by the State Party has been approved in November 2006,

4. Expresses its concern that little progress has been made to set out how the recommendations of the 2006 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM mission might be addressed,

5. Urges the State Party urgently to provide details for the scope and the timetable for the elaboration of the Management and Conservation Plan,

6. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre, before 1 February 2009, with a state of conservation report of the property and progress achieved in the implementation of a management and conservation plan, delineation of boundaries, creation of a buffer zone and establishment of regulatory tools, for examination by the Committee at its 33rd session in 2009.

Report year: 2007
Mali
Date of Inscription: 1988
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)
Danger List (dates): 2016-present
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 31COM (2007)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top