State of Conservation
144
Reports
26
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1997close
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | • Necessity to save the Sonoran Pronghorn from possible extinction • Environmental concerns in security efforts along the international border |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | • Necessity to save the Sonoran Pronghorn from possible extinction • Environmental concerns in security efforts along the international border |
States Parties: | Mexico |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | • Necessity to save the Sonoran Pronghorn from possible extinction • Environmental concerns in security efforts along the international border |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
Other Threats: | a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.9,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Invasive/alien terrestrial species |
States Parties
Australia Belarus Canada Costa Rica Ecuador France Honduras India Indonesia Mexico Nepal New Zealand Niger Poland Saint Lucia Senegal Solomon Islands South Africa Sri Lanka United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.