State of Conservation
68
Reports
68
Properties concerned
51
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2010 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: | Bolivia (Plurinational State of) |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Insufficient maintenance |
States Parties: | Azerbaijan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties
Afghanistan Andorra Azerbaijan Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Chile Colombia Czechia Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Haiti India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Jordan Kenya Lebanon Libya Lithuania Mali Mauritania Mexico Mozambique Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal Serbia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Turkmenistan Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.