Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

27
Reports
9
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2002close
Threats* : Input of excess energyclose
Upper Middle Rhine Valley (2008)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2012)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2010)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2008)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2006)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2005)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Yellowstone National Park (2004)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add
Threats*: Input of excess energy
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Brazil Germany Lao People's Democratic Republic Malta Morocco Nepal Peru United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
Threats
Input of excess energy 27

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top