Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

167
Reports
47
Properties concerned
34
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1997close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose
Aapravasi Ghat (2023)
States Parties: Mauritius
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Commercial development
Aapravasi Ghat (2021)
States Parties: Mauritius
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Aapravasi Ghat (2019)
States Parties: Mauritius
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Agra Fort (2004)
States Parties: India
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort
Agra Fort (2003)
States Parties: India
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Commercial development
Antigua Guatemala (2004)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Commercial development
Antigua Guatemala (2003)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Antigua Guatemala (2001)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Commercial development
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1997)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Commercial development
Bahla Fort (2008)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort;
Bahla Fort (2007)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
Bahla Fort (2006)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
Bahla Fort (2005)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort
Bahla Fort (2004)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Commercial development
Danger List:  Yes
Bahla Fort (2003)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Commercial development
Danger List:  Yes
Bahla Fort (2002)
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/18
Threats*: Commercial development
Danger List:  Yes
Belfries of Belgium and France (2008)
States Parties: Belgium France
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Belfries of Belgium and France (2007)
States Parties: Belgium France
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Borobudur Temple Compounds (2006)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors around the property
Borobudur Temple Compounds (2004)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Commercial development
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Australia Belgium Bulgaria Chile China Colombia France Germany Ghana Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Lebanon Malta Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Peru Poland Republic of Korea Russian Federation Sri Lanka Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Viet Nam Yemen
Threats
Commercial development 167

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top