State of Conservation
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.3 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Risk of desintegration and destruction of structures, surfaces and decorative art |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Increase in salt contamination of the mud-brick |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fragility of the abdobe structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Deliberate neglect of historic properties |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Highly crumbly basic building material |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 167
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.