State of Conservation
68
Reports
20
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1992close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressure |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.