State of Conservation
219
Reports
49
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1998close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2014 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Weakening of conservation controls |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Brucella infection threat to bison population |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czechia Denmark Estonia France Germany Italy Lithuania Malta Montenegro North Macedonia Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia Spain Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.