Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

174
Reports
44
Properties concerned
31
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1994close
Threats* : Legal frameworkclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Western Caucasus (2016)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2014)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2014
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2013)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2012)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2011)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2010)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2009)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Western Caucasus (2008)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Legal framework
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Albania Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czechia France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Latvia Lithuania Malta Montenegro North Macedonia Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Türkiye Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Threats
Legal framework 174

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top