State of Conservation
167
Reports
34
Properties concerned
25
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2021close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Czechia Denmark France Germany Italy Montenegro North Macedonia Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Spain Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.