Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








275 Decisions
13 Resolutions
Year start: 2011close
Year end: 2011close
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-11/10EXT.COM/2, Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Document.
The World Heritage Committee, Recalling its Decision 35 COM 18, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), Elects Malaysia as Vice-Chairperson of the 36th session of the World Heritage Committee whose mandate will be until the end of the 36th session of the Committee (June/July 2012); Elects Ms Beatriz Hernandez, Mexico, as Rapporteur of the 36th session of the World Heritage Committee, whose mandate will be until the end of the 36th session of the Committee (June/July ...
The General Assembly, Elects H.E. Mr. Pablo César GROUX (Plurinational State of Bolivia) as Chairperson of the 18th General Assembly, Elects Ms. Hyosang JO (Republic of Korea) as Rapporteur of the 18th General Assembly, Elects Slovenia, Cap Verde and Kuwait as Vice-Chairpersons of the 18th General Assembly.
The General Assembly,  Having examined Document WHC-11/18.GA/2A, Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Document.
The General Assembly,  Elects Qatar (State Party without a property on the World Heritage List) as member of the World Heritage Committee; Elects the following eight States Parties as members of the World Heritage Committee: Algeria, Colombia, Germany, India, Japan, Malaysia, Senegal and Serbia.
The General Assembly, Takes note of the report of the Rapporteur of the 17th session of the General Assembly of States Parties to the World Heritage Convention (UNESCO, 2009).
The General Assembly,  Takes note of the report of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage on its activities (2010-2011).
The General Assembly,  Having examined the accounts of the World Heritage Fund for the financial period ended 31 December 2009 approved by the Deputy Comptroller (Document WHC-11/18.GA/INF.6) in conformity with the Financial Regulations of the World Heritage Fund that stipulate that the accounts of the Fund shall be submitted to the General Assembly of the States Parties to the Convention (Article 6, paragraph 6.4), Approves the accounts of the World Heritage Fund for the financial period ended 31 December 2009 (Document WHC-11/18.GA/INF.6); Takes note of the accounts of the World ...
The General Assembly,  Taking into account Article 16 paragraph 1 of the World Heritage Convention on the determination, in the form of a uniform percentage, of the amount of the contributions to be paid to the World Heritage Fund by States Parties, Decides to set at 1% the percentage for the calculation of the amount of the contributions to be paid to the World Heritage Fund by States Parties for the financial period 2012-2013; Also takes note of Document WHC-11/18.GA/INF.7 on the status of compulsory and voluntary contributions to the World Heritage Fund; Further takes note of ...
The General Assembly, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/18.GA/8 and WHC-11/18.GA/INF.8, 2. Endorses the recommendations of the independent evaluation by UNESCO’s external auditor on the implementation of the Global Strategy from its inception in 1994 to 2011 and the Partnership for Conservation Initiative (PACT) requested by its Resolution 17 GA 9 (UNESCO, 2009), 3. Welcomes the views of all States Parties that provided comments following the Circular Letter dated 13 July 2011; 4. Urges all parties to take into consideration the recommendations of the External Auditor  while ...
The General Assembly, Having examined Document WHC-11/18.GA/9, Recalling Decision 35 COM 5C adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), Takes note of the progress report on recommendations of the External Audit; Also takes note of the IOS Audit Plan for the World Heritage Centre for 2012.
The General Assembly, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/18.GA/10 and WHC-11/18.GA/INF.10, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 6 adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Thanks the Government of Bahrain for having hosted the first meeting of World Heritage related category 2 centres and of relevant UNESCO Chairs and Higher Education and Research Institutions; 4. Takes note of the report on this meeting, as well as of the reports on the World Heritage related category 2 centres in Bahrain, Brazil, China, Mexico, Norway and South Africa; 5. Also takes ...
The General Assembly, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/18.GA/11 and WHC-11/18.GA/INF.11, 2. Recalling Decisions 35 COM 12A, 35 COM 12B, 35 COM 12C, 35 COM 12D, and 35 COM 12E adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Thanks the Working Group and its Chairperson, Mr Greg Terrill, for the leadership in elaborating the Vision and Action Plan in an open and participative way; 4. Adopts the Vision and Action Plan and requests the World Heritage Centre to disseminate it widely; 5. Recalls the request by the 35th session of the World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Taking into consideration Rule 8 (Observers) of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee,  2. Authorizes the participation in the 35th session as observers of those representatives of the international governmental organizations (IGOs), international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), permanent observer missions to UNESCO and non profit-making institutions having activities in the fields covered by the Convention, who have requested observer participation at the session and as listed in Section A ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/3A.Rev, Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Document.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/3B.Rev, 2. Adopts the Agenda included in the above-mentioned Document.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/5A and WHC-11/35.COM/INF.5A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 5A adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the activities undertaken and of the partnerships established by the World Heritage Centre; 4. Also takes note with appreciation of the concrete contribution of the States Parties and all partners who, through their financial and/or technical support, contributed to the efforts to implement the Convention reported in the document WHC-11/35.COM/5A; 5. Reminds the World Heritage Centre of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/5B, 2. Takes note of the reports of the Advisory Bodies (ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN) on their activities and expresses its gratitude for the efforts towards the implementation of the Convention; 3. Requests the Advisory Bodies for the next sessions in order to take informed and transparent decisions: a) to harmonize their reports, indicating the human and financial resources committed by the Advisory Bodies in the different activities they are in charge of, b) to include a general joint comment on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/5C, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 5G adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Also recalling Decision 184 EX 8 Part II, adopted by the UNESCO Executive Board at its 184th session (30 March - 15 April 2010), 4. Takes note with appreciation of the implementation of the 9 recommendations of the External Auditor, notably the centralisation of all calls for funds and collection of contributions by the Bureau of Financial Management, and the adoption of a result-based management ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/5D and WHC-11/35.COM/12B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 5A, and 34 COM 5C adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Takes note of the above-mentioned documents and further notes the discussions at the expert meeting on decision-making procedures of the statutory organs of the World Heritage Convention (Bahrain, December 2010); 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to put in practice the mandated roles assigned to each under ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/5E, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 10, 33 COM 14A.2, 34 COM 5D adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Welcomes the progress made in implementing the recommended actions; 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre, in collaboration with the Advisory Bodies, and with the support of interested States Parties to continue its efforts to implement various activities contained in the Action Plan 2012; 5. Also requests that the results of the proposed ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/5F, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 5F.2 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Thanks the Government of Switzerland for its offer of financial and technical support to specific activities supporting the Steering Group guiding the development of the new and inclusive Programme on World Heritage and Sustainable Tourism, and welcomes its offer to host an expert meeting in Sils/Engadine, Switzerland, in October 2011; 4. Also thanks the Governments of Sweden, Norway, Denmark and the Nordic World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/6, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 9C adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Thanks the Government of Bahrain for having hosted the first meeting of World Heritage related Category 2 centres and of relevant UNESCO Chairs and Higher Education and Research Institutions; 4. Takes note that the report on this meeting will be presented to the General Assembly of States Parties and the Committee; 5. Also takes note with satisfaction of the reports on the World Heritage related Category 2 centres in Bahrain, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7.1, 2. Recalling Decisions 30 COM 9, 32 COM 7.1, 33 COM 7C and 34 COM 19 adopted at its 30th (Vilnius, 2006), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, and the provisions for buffer zones established in the Operational Guidelines, 3. Notes the progress made with the wide range of issues relevant to World Heritage and buffer zones including the publication on "World Heritage and Buffer Zones" (World Heritage Papers 25), and considerations within discussions on ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7.2, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 5.2, 32 COM 7.3, 33 COM 7.2 and 34 COM 7.2, adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the evaluation report on the implementation of the Reinforced Monitoring Mechanism presented and the detailed statistical analysis; 4. Also notes the recommendations presented in Part III of the above-mentioned document and reiterates the principle for operation, outlined in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.1, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes with concern the insufficient progress in implementing the corrective measures adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 4. Notes with alarm that transhumant cattle have invaded a large part of the Park, and artisanal, small-scale mining are occurring within the property, which may threaten the integrity of the property; 5. Expresses its deep concern that the aerial surveys of the 2010 ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.2, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes with concern the continuing  political crisis in Côte d'Ivoire, which has lead to the further intensification of illegal activities within Comoé National Park since 2002, including poaching and encroachment by cattle and agriculture; 4. Acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party and its conservation partners to reinforce the surveillance of the property, to develop a management plan, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.3, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the signing of the Abidjan Declaration, July 2010, which aims to establish a joint system of monitoring and management coordination between the Guinean and Ivorian States Parties and strengthen tri-national cooperation, and reiterates its request to the States Parties to consult at the earliest to develop and implement a common strategy for the management and joint surveillance of Mount Nimba, by organising a meeting of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.4, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Extends its sincerest condolences to the families of the guards killed during operations to protect the property since its last session; 4. Welcomes the significant efforts made by the managing authority (ICCN), with the support of donors and conservation partners to implement the corrective measures despite very difficult conditions, especially the persistent problems related to the lack of security; 5. Expresses its deep ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.5, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes with satisfaction the substantial progress made in evacuating the armed groups from the property, increasing patrol coverage and closing down illegal mining areas; 4. Expresses its hope that necessary security conditions can now be progressively created to enable the managers of the property to progress in the implementation of the corrective measures; 5. Welcomes the approval of the general management plan and the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add; 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.6, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 3. Welcomes the improvement of the general security situation and the improved cooperation of park staff with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) army stationed around the park, but remains concerned about the presence of some remaining groups of Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) rebels in and around the property; 4. Also welcomes the progress made in implementing the corrective measures updated by the World Heritage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.7, adopted at its 34rd session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Reiterates its concern about the delay in the implementation of the corrective measures established by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007), in particular the anti-poaching strategy and the joint operation between the park's management authority (ICCN) and the Congolese Army to remove poachers and armed groups from the property; 4. Regrets that no information was provided on the strategy to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.8, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its sincere condolences to the families of the guards who were killed during protection operations at the property since its previous session; 4. Welcomes the continued efforts to implement the corrective measures, and in particular the preparation of the management plan and efforts to curb poaching; 5. Expresses its concern about the preliminary results of the 2011 wildlife survey, which seem to indicate that ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.9, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report on the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session, making it impossible to assess progress in addressing the corrective measures; 4. Expresses its concern that the State party has not yet organized the donor conference, which was requested by the World Heritage Committee since its 33rd session and notes that without ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.2, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the confirmation that illegal logging has been halted in Marojejy National Park, but notes with concern that illegal exploitation continues in Masoala National Park and that the pressure appears to have moved to other protected areas despite Decree 2010-141 prohibiting the cutting, exploitation and export of rosewood and ebony in Madagascar; 4. Expresses its concern regarding the significant increase in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.10, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its grave concern over the incessant degradation of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property on the basis of reports received, indicating that several species of antelope and other large wildlife have disappeared from the property, or are about to disappear, due to extensive poaching within and around the property; 4. Notes with concern the lack of progress in implementing corrective measures, mainly because ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.11, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its deep concern over the results of the aerial surveillance mission in March 2011, which showed a significant decline in biodiversity and a significant degradation of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to undertake, as soon as possible, a census of key species of fauna of the property with the technical support of the IUCN Species Survival Commission to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.12, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the progress achieved by the State Party in the implementation of most of the corrective measures, including the State Party's rapid response to the 2011 mission recommendations to set up an integrated monitoring system and a swamp deer recovery plan; 4. Considers, based on the findings of the 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN monitoring mission, that the recovery of the Outstanding Universal Value has ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.29, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the conclusion of the 2011 World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property continues to degrade due to an inadequate level of water flow and quality into the property; 4. Notes with appreciation that the State Party has developed significant plans during the last three decades to provide more natural flow of water and improve water quality, but expresses its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.13, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the State Party's efforts at establishing a systematic set of instruments designed to provide an integrated legal, regulatory and planning framework over which to address conservation concerns, and urges it to complete this process as soon as possible; 4. Acknowledges the State Party's decision not to immediately re-issue any of the oil concession area relinquished by the Overseas Petroleum Investment Corporation ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.14, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), Welcomes the State Party's efforts in implementing the preliminary corrective measures, and urges the international community to provide further support for the implementation of these measures; Regrets that, despite the State Party's efforts, the joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission was postponed once more due to security concerns, and requests the State Party to invite a joint mission to Bogotá in lieu ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.53, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the revised Reconstruction Strategy as the basis for the reconstruction of the Muzibu Azaala Mpanga, recognises the collaborative efforts that have achieved it, and considers that the Strategy should include the results of a research project to collect documentation on the traditional building practices of the other Gandan tombs that will inform the detailed plans; 4. Requests the State Party to submit to the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.16, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the progress made by the State Party in the areas of limiting sea erosion, the removal of vegetation, the control of grazing, and the conservation work carried out at some of the important monuments; 4. Requests the State Party to complete the work on the definition of the boundaries of the property and its buffer zone, as per the corrective measures adopted for the property; 5. Also requests further information on the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.17, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Requests the State Party to continue its work on all the corrective measures adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006); 4. Reiterates its request to review the draft retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value and to develop a proposal for the Desired state of conservation, with a revised timeframe for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger, for examination by ...
Sites: Abu Mena
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.18, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party in addressing the conservation of the property and encourages it to continue its work for the protection of the property, in particular the implementation of the identified corrective measures; 4. Requests the State Party to submit, as per Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, detailed and updated technical information on the proposed jetty for the protection of the property ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.19, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the work carried out by the State Party for the protection and conservation of the property and encourages it to continue with its efforts to implement the identified corrective measures for the property, in particular the implementation of priority conservation measures and the development of the conservation and management plan; 4. Invites the State Party to submit an International Assistance request to carry out ...
The World Heritage Committee, I 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recalling the relevant provisions on the protection of cultural heritage including the four Geneva Conventions (1949), the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 1954, the Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972, the inscription of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls at the request of Jordan on the World Heritage List (1981) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.21, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the continued progress that has been made in generating support for the conservation of the property in particular from the German International Cooperation (GIZ), and the Social Fund for Development (SFD) and encourages the State Party to continue to give the optimum support to the regeneration and conservation of Zabid; 4. Notes the progress with finalizing and implementing the Conservation Plan and the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7A.20 and 34 COM 7A.20 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Takes note of the draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value submitted by the State Party, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4. Regrets that the State Party has not submitted a state of conservation report, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 5. Reiterates its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.23, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the state of conservation report and of the draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value submitted by the State Party, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4. Thanks the Director-General of UNESCO for having organised, at UNESCO Headquarters, an International Forum on 2 March 2011 to mark the Tenth Anniversary of the devastating destruction of the Bamiyan Buddha ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the State Party's for its sustained commitment to the conservation and protection of the property and encourages it to continue its efforts, particularly in regard to the control of construction and protection of the landscape; 4. Also encourages the international community to continue supporting conservation works with the required technical expertise and funding; 5. Reiterates its request to invite a joint ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the property and encourages it to continue such efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a map showing the boundaries of the property at the time of inscription, meeting all technical requirements established by the World Heritage Committee, and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling decisions 33 COM 7A.24 and 34 COM 7A.26 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts of the State Party to address the threats that led to the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger and encourages the State Party to continue its work on the implementation of the adopted corrective measures, in particular the implementation of a sustained programme for the conservation of the terraces, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.88, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the halting of all work on the Bagrati Cathedral, as well as progress in the implementation of the rehabilitation programme and the conservation master plan for Gelati Monastery; 4. Notes with satisfaction that the coordination between the Georgian Church and the national authorities has been enhanced, joint activities reinforced and the management of religious and sacred World Heritage properties in Georgia ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.27 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party in the implementation of the World Heritage Committee's decisions with regard to the corrective measures aimed at future removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Urges the State Party to submit proposals for a buffer zone as a minor boundary modification, as well as to develop and finalize the Urban Land-Use Master Plan of the City of Mtskheta; 5. Also ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Decides to adjourn the debate on this agenda item until its next ordinary session.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.29, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the continued efforts of the State Party in addressing critical conservation issues at the property and in responding to the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee in spite of the challenging situation caused by the February 2010 earthquake; 4. Takes note of the submission of the International Assistance request for the organization of the proposed International Meeting in coordination with the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.30, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party to implement some of the corrective measures; 4. Notes the results of the November 2010 joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, endorses its recommendations and requests the State Party to: a) Secure regular funding for the protection, conservation, restoration, maintenance and management of the property, b) Install a clear institutional structure ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.31, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the efforts being made by the State Party for the conservation of the property and encourages it to continue such efforts in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Notes the results of the February 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, endorses its recommendations and requests the State Party to: a) Finalize the approval process for the creation of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.32, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Commends the State Party for the organization of the high-level meeting on the Conservation of the World Heritage properties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007); 4. Welcomes the Kinshasa Declaration in which the Prime Minister on behalf of the State Party makes the commitment to implement all the corrective measures adopted by the World ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.1, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the development of activities which target some of the identified objectives by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), but regrets that many other important issues are not taken into account; 4. Takes note of the affirmation by the State Party that populations of flagship species have not declined since the time of the property's inscription and requests that the State Party should submit ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.3, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party's progress in addressing the key recommendations of the 2008 mission, and in particular the adoption and implementation of the Mount Kenya Management Plan 2010-2020 and the completion of the Environmental Impact Assessment for the first construction phase of the fence intended to minimise community-wildlife conflicts; 4. Requests the State Party to fully implement the remaining recommendations including ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Expresses its utmost concern about the proposed construction of the GIBE III dam on the Omo River in Ethiopia and its likely impacts on Lake Turkana, which is located downstream in neighbouring Kenya and draws almost 90% of its inflow from the above river; 3. Takes note of the African Development Bank's April 2010 study of the GIBE III proposal, "Assessment of Hydrological Impacts of Ethiopia's Omo Basin on Kenya's Lake Turkana Water Levels", which concludes that the construction and operation of the dam ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.4, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party and its partners to restore the property's Outstanding Universal Value and improve its management, and notes that the Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary has been removed from the Montreux List of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands in September 2009; 4. Considers that without detailed data on the trends of resident and migratory bird populations, it is not possible to assess the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.5, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for the progress achieved in implementing the 2008 mission recommendations; 4. Takes note of the efforts undertaken by the State Party to finalize the proclamation of the World Heritage status under national legislation, with the help of a Mediator and requests the State Party to: a) Urgently finalize this process, and submit the proclamation to the World Heritage Centre as soon as possible, b) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.3, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Reiterates its utmost concern about the weakening of the legal protection status of the property, the different development projects (Stiegler's Gorge dam, Kidunda dam and Mukuju River uranium mine and oil exploration) which are being considered, ongoing wildlife poaching and the evident deterioration in the management of the property; 4. Urges the State Party to implement the following actions in order to protect the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.5, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Noting with appreciation the statement by the State Party at the session, welcomes its decision to reconsider the North Road and to maintain the stretch of 53 km from Kleins gate to Tabora B traversing the northern wilderness area of the property as a gravel road, under the management of the "Tanzania National Parks" (TANAPA) and reserved mainly for tourism and administrative purposes, as it is currently; 4. Calls upon the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.7, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the decision of the State Party of Zambia not to approve the proposed mining operations in Chiawa Game Management Area and Lower Zambezi National Park nor the original proposal for a tourist and conference facility in the Chiawa Game Management Area across the river from the property, which could have impacted the property's Outstanding Universal Value; 4. Notes that mining exploration is on-going in other parts of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.8, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Commends the State Party for the progress made in addressing land tenure issues by integrating pastoral lands into the buffer zone, thereby enlarging it and increasing the protection of the property, and notes the steps taken to support traditional Aboriginal communities within this buffer zone; 4. Encourages the State Party to develop an interim management plan, in order to give due consideration to the property's ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Notes with extreme concern the approval of Liquefied Natural Gas processing and port facilities on Curtis Island within the property; 3. Urges the State Party to undertake a comprehensive strategic assessment of the entire property, identifying planned and potential future development that could impact the Outstanding Universal Value to enable a long-term plan for sustainable development that will protect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Regrets that the State Party did not inform the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.12, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the initiation of the Sundarbans Environmental and Livelihoods Security project, which includes support for ecological monitoring and documenting the impacts of climate change on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and welcomes the State Party's commitment to expand its coastal greenbelt zone through mangrove afforestation as a mitigation measure to climate change; 4. Also notes that in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32COM 7B.11, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Notes with concern reports that unapproved construction has begun at the Liuku dam on the Nu River outside the property, which appears to have resulted in the displacement of the Lisu people and the construction of new roads adjacent to its boundaries, and notes reports that surveying for four projects - Maji, Yabilou, Liuku and Saige, outside the boundary - is underway, including drilling and road construction; 4. Also ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.13, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property nor an Environmental Impact Assessment of the alternatives to the proposed upgrading of the highway NH37, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session; 4. Notes reports received by IUCN that: a) The park authorities have increased efforts to prevent poaching, and that poaching is now largely under ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.14, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the State Party's initiatives to increase the involvement of local communities in the management of the property, and commends the State Party for its efforts to ensure the long-term conservation of satellite wetlands, in line with the recommendations of the 2008 reactive monitoring mission; 4. Notes with serious concern that the completion of the Govardhan Drain and the Dholpur - Bharatpur drinking water project ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.13, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes with satisfaction that an International Workshop on effective management of the property was held in November 2010 as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session, and encourages the State Party to implement the workshop's recommendations; 4. Expresses its grave concern that road construction within the property has not ceased as repeatedly requested by the World Heritage Committee, that forest ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.14, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes with appreciation the State Party's efforts to implement the World Heritage Committee's recommendations adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), and encourages the State Party to continue and further intensify these efforts; 4. Expresses its utmost concern that road development plans and agricultural encroachment continue to pose a major threat to the property, and considers that these threats represent both a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.18, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Commends the State Party for its progress in implementing the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), particularly in relation to illegal fishing; 4. Urges the State Party to expedite the application for the designation of the Sulu Sea as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area, and encourages it to obtain the necessary expert advice in order to complete the process and to consider ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 8B.9, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at the time of inscription of the property at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4. Notes with regret that there appears to have been limited progress in the implementation of the recommendations adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session, despite the clear ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling its Decision 34 COM 7B.18, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the State Party's statement that it is conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment for the expansion of Highway 304, and expresses its concern over reports that highway expansion works are already underway; 4. Also expresses its concern about reports of escalating threats to the property's Outstanding Universal Value from encroachment, the proposed Huay Samong Dam, cattle grazing, and ineffective management; 5. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.20, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes that the State Party is developing a plan for the sustainable use of the Cua Van Cultural Centre, and requests the State Party to submit this plan to the World Heritage Centre; 4. Also notes the efforts made by the State Party to address the multiple development and population pressures affecting the property, but remains concerned that these continue to negatively affect its Outstanding Universal Value; 5. Further ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.19 and 34 COM 8B.5, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Also recalling that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property has been repeatedly and significantly impacted by the development of ski facilities and ski runs within the property and its buffer zone, 4. Expresses serious concern about the recent approval of the replacement and capacity upgrade of two ski facilities in the property's buffer zone, and recalls its Decision, taken at its 34th session ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 8B.10, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Welcomes the efforts of the State Party, in particular the authorities in New Caledonia, customary owners, NGOs and other stakeholders to improve the management of the property, through the establishment of co-management committees and the Conservatory of Natural Areas (Conservatoire des Espaces Naturels - CEN); 4. Expresses its serious concern about the permits granted to the mining company GEOVIC to explore for cobalt ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.22, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that it was not possible to organize the meeting with the Russian authorities and other stakeholders to identify how impacts of the re-opening of the Baikalsk Paper and Pulp Mill (BPPM) on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property can be addressed, and requests that this be organized as soon as possible; 4. Reiterates its serious concern regarding the re-opening of the BPPM without a close-loop water system, ...
Sites: Lake Baikal
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.24, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in implementing some of the recommendations of the 2010 monitoring mission defining the boundaries of the property; 4. Requests the State Party to submit as soon as possible: a) The updated map of the boundaries of the property as well as the areas proposed for future inclusion in the Caucasus Strict Nature Reserve, b) Information on the activities allowed in the Nature Monuments ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.25, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its utmost concern about the boundary changes made to the northern component of the property, Yugyd Va National Park (YVNP), which removes the protection status of these areas, and about the approval of a gold mine within the property at Chudnoe; 4. Considers that the excisions made to the property and the approved gold mine at Chudnoe represent a clear potential threat to the property's Outstanding Universal Value, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.22 and 33 COM 7B.27 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Expresses its utmost concern that the State Party has not yet made an unequivocal decision to abandon the construction of the Altai gas pipeline through the property as requested in Decision 33 COM 7B.27, and about reports that the construction is scheduled to go ahead this year; 4. Reiterates that any decision to go forward with the construction of the gas ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35 COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.26, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the conclusion of the 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission that the Outstanding Universal Value for which the property has been inscribed is still present, but could be threatened by a number of proposed development projects, including the proposed additional dredging of the Lower Guadalquivir River, the over-abstraction of the Doñana Aquifer, the proposed Balboa oil ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Considering that the lack of legal protection of most of the Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park (CdVNP) poses a significant threat to the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, 3. Expresses its serious concern that the legal framework protecting 72% of CdVNP, the larger component of the Cerrado Protected Areas is no longer in effect; 4. Requests the State Party to continue its work to reinstate the legal protection regime of the property in its entirety; 5. Takes note of the commitment of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.32, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that the State Party of Panama did not submit a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session; 4. Notes with appreciation the efforts of both the States Parties of Costa Rica and Panama to establish a Bi-national Executing Technical Unit for the management of La Amistad International Park (UTEB-PILA), and to commission a transboundary Strategic ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7A.15, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the further progress achieved by the State Party in implementing the 2010 World Heritage Centre/IUCN joint reactive monitoring mission recommendations; 4. Notes that a number of critical conservation activities are still at the planning stage, including those relating to securing the biosecurity chain of inspection and control of invasive species, and the development of a tourism strategy in response to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.34, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note that the State Party has stabilized the illegal land market by advancing significantly in the land titling process in areas abutting the property, and restructured the administration of protected areas so as to clarify the mandate of pertinent governmental agencies; 4. Expresses its serious concern over the alarming trend in illegal drug trafficking carried out in and around the property, which is undermining ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.35, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Commends the State Party for the progress achieved in reducing illegal logging in the property, and encourages the State Party to continue its actions to control illegal logging, as well as fires and other types of habitat conversion; 4. Welcomes the State Party's efforts to promote alternative livelihoods for local communities, and requests the State Party to implement the recommendations of the 2011 reactive monitoring ...
The World Heritage Committee 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.38, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the management plan for the Special Zone of Marine Protection has yet to be finalised or adopted, as previously urged by the World Heritage Committee in Decision 33 COM 7B.38, and considers that the property's lack of management capacity, if not addressed, could pose a potential threat to its Outstanding Universal Value; 4. Requests the State Party to urgently finalise the Management Plan for the Special Zone of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.36, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the recommendations of the December 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission; 4. Requests the State Party to consider the recommendations of the 2010 reactive monitoring mission in future management, with a particular focus on: a) Strengthening governmental capacity across sectors to effectively plan infrastructure and land and resource use in the Alto Madre de Dios river corridor, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.37, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Extends its deepest sympathies to the people of St Lucia, and to the families of those who lost their lives in the wake of Hurricane Tomas; 4. Notes the State Party's progress in enforcing a moratorium on residential and hotel developments within the property; 5. Welcomes the State Party's intention to undertake a Limits of Acceptable Change study, as well as a review of land use plans and development control guidelines, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 34 COM 7B.4 and 34COM 8B.13, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the progress reported by the State Party in addressing the 2007 and 2008 missions recommendations, and in particular the ban on agriculture and the shift towards a strategy to improve livestock in the property; 4. Considers that the work on livestock improvement should be part of a larger strategy on pastoralism for the property, which takes into account its carrying capacity and which respects ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.41, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the State Party's progress in implementing the reactive monitoring mission's recommendations of 2009 relating to management, visitor management and site presentation, and its efforts to monitor and mitigate the negative impacts of the port expansion on the property; 4. Also notes the efforts made to strengthen monitoring of archaeological remains and the recovery of what appears to be a sunken ship and related ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.42, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the submission of the retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, under revision by the Advisory Bodies; 4. Also takes note of the indication by the State Party on actions taken to address threats to the property including the Western access, public use, governance and management arrangements, uncontrolled development at the Machu Picchu village and other threats identified in the 2009 Emergency ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.46, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the information provided by the State Party on the proposed Port of Lamu at Manda Bay and the Lamu-Addis-Juba-Kigali corridor development project; 4. Expresses its concern that basic detailed information on the project, such as its scope, exact location and scale, the projected kinds of development foreseen, and the projected population growth has not been provided by the State Party as requested by the World Heritage ...
Sites: Lamu Old Town
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.48, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its utmost concern that very little progress has been achieved in implementing corrective measures; 4. Regrets that the Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre built near the Sankoré Mosque remains unused and is deteriorating and encourages the State Party to address this as a matter of urgency; 5. Reiterates its request for the following corrective measures to be urgently addressed: a) Create an inter-ministerial committee for ...
Sites: Timbuktu
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.49, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the State Party's official adoption of the Planning Policy Guidance, the main purpose of which is to control, together with other existing tools, the development, legitimate aspirations and change in the buffer zone of Aapravasi Ghat in order to protect the property's Outstanding Universal Value; 4. Acknowledges the progress made in undertaking research on indentured labour; 5. Regrets that the State Party has ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add.2, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.48, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the results of the reactive monitoring mission to the property and the recommendations made for improvement of the state of conservation of the architectural heritage, management issues, the illegal occupation of the buildings and lands, and the problems of coastal erosion; 4. Welcomes with satisfaction the appointment of a manager for the site, but requests that an administrative note for the appointment be ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the effort made by the State Party in securing resources for the conservation of the property through negotiating a 12 million Euro loan with the French Development Agency; 4. Expresses its strong concern about the ongoing degradation and collapse of historic urban fabric and the construction of non-conforming buildings, affecting the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 5. Reiterates its request to the State ...
The World Heritage Committee 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.52, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Reiterates its concern at the potential adverse impact of the approved mining site on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Recalls its position on mining and World Heritage and the policy statement of the International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM); 5. Notes that the State Party has halted mining operations at the mining site 7 km from the property boundary to ensure full compliance with national ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.54, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party in implementing the requests made by the World Heritage Committee and urges it to secure resources for the operation of the Stone Town Conservation and Development Authority (STCDA) and the sustained implementation of the Heritage Management Plan; 4. Notes the results of the January 2011 ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and endorses its recommendations; 5. Expresses its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the extensive work in drafting the final Plan for the Protection and Enhancement of the property and its protected area (PPEAS) and requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed of progress in its implementation; 4. Also takes note of the summary pilot project for the development of the port, but regrets that the requested impact study was not transmitted, and encourages the State Party ...
Sites: Tipasa
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.52, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the information given by the State Party concerning actions taken in the perspective of the conservation of the Kasbah of Algiers and encourages it to continue its efforts towards the finalisation of the emergency measures and the implementation of the Permanent Safeguarding Plan for the property; 4. Also takes note of the information on the rich archaeological content discovered during the excavations ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.55, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not submitted the requested report on the state of conservation of the property as well as the progress report on modifications to the Cairo Financial Centre and on the elaboration of the management plan; 4. Takes note of the information provided by the World Heritage Centre on the progress made in the implementation of the programme for the elaboration of a conservation/regeneration plan ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.56, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of its recommendations and urges it to finalise the process to establish functioning management arrangements with adequate resources for operation; 4. Expresses its deep concern about the state of conservation of the property and the continued need for implementation of holistic strategies to address pressing conservation, maintenance and ...
Sites: Petra
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.56, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Requests the State Party to finalize a scientifically and technically sound conservation and restoration project for the Stylite tower and to submit it a soon as possible to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, prior to implementation; 4. Urges the State Party to complete the management plan for the property, including a comprehensive conservation plan, as well as an archaeological research policy and a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.57, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note that the State Party has provided a state of conservation report for the property, and additional information on the management plan, on improved institutional mechanisms, and information and studies related to ongoing developments at the property, as requested since 2006, and specifically Decisions 32COM7B.60, 33COM7B.57 and 34COM7B.57; 4. Strongly encourages the State Party to establish as soon as possible a ...
Sites: Tyre
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 27 COM 7B.103, adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the requested state of conservation report; 4. Expresses its deep concern regarding the state of conservation of the property, in particular the lack of implementation of the Management Plan and conservation interventions, as well as the lack of enforcement of existing regulations, which appear to threaten the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 5. Requests the State ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.58, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes that the State Party has not submitted a state of conservation report to its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions; 4. Urges the State Party to implement its earlier decisions and the measures recommended by the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission of January 2007; 5. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2012, a report on ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.59, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Encourages the State Party when conditions permit to implement the recommendations contained in the mission report, and in particular to consider a stakeholder workshop to be organized with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies to address the many dimensions of an appropriate conservation strategy for the property; 4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2012, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.60, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to set up a management entity; 4. Notes the progress on a number of specific projects aimed at the better conservation and presentation of the property; 5. Requests the State Party to provide additional information on the new management entity including its roles and responsibilities, its relationship to the local management committee, between the Centre for the conservation and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.61, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party and appreciates the magnitude of the actions implemented to safeguard the heritage of the Historic City of Meknes; 4. Requests the State Party to take into account the recommendations of the expert who visited the Berdieyinne Mosque in April 2010 and those of ICOMOS in its 2011 evaluation, in view of the implementation of the restoration project of the mosque; 5. Also ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.63, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the findings of the reactive monitoring mission in regard to the physical state of conservation of the structures, archaeological remains, and mural paintings at the property; 4. Requests the State Party to develop an ongoing monitoring system to ensure the continued stability of these structures, archaeological remains, and mural paintings, and to refrain from planning or implementing restoration projects prior to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.64, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the proposals by the State Party, including the establishment of a buffer zone, the modification or abandonment of deleterious developments, the improvement of conservation standards, the use of traditional materials, and the improved controlling of illegal developments; 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, detailed information on ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Takes note of the report submitted by the State Party and the information provided on the state of conservation of the property; 3. Welcomes the cancellation of the decrees of declassification within the Archaeological Park of Carthage-Sidi Bou Said; 4. Encourages the State Party to submit a minor boundary modification in order to define a sufficient buffer zone to preserve the integrity of the property, and to indicate the legal framework of protection; 5. Urges the State Party to complete, adopt and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 25 COM III.239, adopted at its 25th session (Helsinki, 2001), 3. Notes the information provided by the State Party, expresses its deep concern about the state of conservation of the property and urges the State Party to implement measures to control urban development and finalise the approval process for the legislative framework; 4. Also urges the State Party to prepare the Urban Conservation Plan and develop capacity building programmes with the support of the Social Fund for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.64, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the steps taken by the State Party to pursue the implementation of the Committee decision and urges the State Party to implement the rest of the measures proposed by the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission carried out in February-March 2009; 4. Encourages the State Party to draft the management plan of the property under the project "South Asia Tourism Infrastructure Development ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35 COM/7B.Add.2, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 8B.24, 32 COM 8B.102, 33 COM 7B.65, 34 COM 7B.66 adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, New Zealand, 2007), 32nd session (Québec, Canada, 2008), 33rd session (Seville, Spain, 2009), and 34th session (Brasilia, Brazil, 2010), 3. Thanks the Director-General of UNESCO for dispatching her Special Envoy, Mr. Koïchiro Matsuura, to the Kingdoms of Thailand and of Cambodia in February 2011 with a view to resuming dialogue between the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.66, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts of the State Party's national and local authorities to strengthen the protection of the property and its setting; 4. Welcomes the proposal for boundary modification to include protective buffer zones for Baisha and Shuhe cluster sites and to enlarge the buffer zone for Dayan town of the property and encourages the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre a formal request for the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.67, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the initiatives taken by the State Party towards the development of the Urban Plan, District Plans, and a proposed law to safeguard Macao's World Heritage; 4. Expresses its concerns at the continuing inadequacy of the current management system, the buffer zone and legal provisions, to protect effectively the very important visual and functional linkages between the inscribed monuments and the wider urban land and seascape ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.68 and 33 COM 8B.47, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with appreciation the efforts made by the State Party to develop the conservation master plans for the three areas of the property and to harmonize these with the Lhasa Urban Development Plan; 4. Welcomes the establishment of a World Heritage Steering Committee in Lhasa to strengthen institutional co-ordination and ensure proper implementation of the conservation master plans; 5. Reiterates its request ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.71, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Reiterates its request to the State Party to inform the World Heritage Centre regarding the progress on: a) the demolition and removal of the remaining debris, pillars and carriageway of the collapsed bridge; b) appropriate decisions of a new more suitable location for a vehicular bridge outside the current and possible future boundaries of the property; 4. Requests the State Party to: a) submit a satisfactory proposal for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.80 adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007) and 34 COM 7B.68, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Urges the State Party to continue progress in the development of an Integrated Management Plan for the Taj Mahal, and Agra Fort properties, and requests it to submit the plan when completed to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies; 4. Encourages the State Party to continue progress in the development of a separate management plan for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.69, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the property and encourages it to continue such efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Reiterates its request to provide the World Heritage Centre with the completed management plan for review by the Advisory Bodies; 5. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2013, an ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.73, adopted at its 33rd session (Sevilla, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the continuing efforts made by the State Party towards the rehabilitation of the property in accordance with the Action Plan prepared in 2007 and the steady progress being made; 4. Thanks the Director-General of UNESCO for having launched immediately after the volcanic eruption of Mount Merapi of Central Java in Indonesia, the emergency safeguarding operation, with the primary objective of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.72, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the progress made by the State Party in developing the management system for the site and acknowledges the information provided on the actions being taken to implement effective management of the site; 4. Urges the State Party to continue its work to address the actions recommended at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), including: a) implementing an effective heritage impact assessment process within the property, b) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.76, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes that the State Party has not removed all of the temporary facilities associated with the Commemorative Event and plans to retain some of these until such time as permanent visitor facilities can be constructed, and urges it to proceed with the removal of all such structures, as previously requested by the World Heritage Committee; 4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre for review by the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 27 COM 7B.51, adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003), 3. Regrets that the State Party has not provided the detailed survey plan on the construction of a new North-South road and mitigation measures to the World Heritage Centre, as requested by the Committee and as requested twice by the World Heritage Centre in 2010; 4. Notes with great concern that construction of the new road has started and progressed rapidly and substantially in 2010, including in Zone 1 and 3 of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.78, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Welcomes the development of the detailed Conservation Management Plan over-arching the existing Management Plans for the two cities and the commitment of the State Party to strengthen the management arrangements for the property through the setting up of a World Heritage office and through reinforcing governmental and other administrative arrangements; 4. Notes the proposals included in the Conservation Management Plan for ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.79 and 34 COM 8B.54, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the efforts and commitment of the State Party for the safeguarding of this property, in particular in undertaking the process of preparation and development of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP); 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to continue its work on the development of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP), based on the draft Statement of Outstanding ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 32 COM 7B.76, adopted at its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), 3. Takes note of the conclusions and recommendations of the March 2011 UNESCO international expert advisory mission to the Pashupati Monument Zone of the Kathmandu Valley with respect to the proposed tunnel road construction of 2007 and the proposed Kathmandu International Airport extension; 4. Urges the State Party to abandon its plans for the tunnel road construction crossing the Pashupati monument zone, to determine a road ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its condolences to the State Party for the loss and devastation caused by the floods in 2010; 4. Regrets that little progress has been made towards the implementation of the World Heritage Committee decisions and that no information has been provided concerning ongoing conservation works including repair works to pavilions, monuments and tombs; 5. Expresses its concern about the serious degradation of the property ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.81, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes that a comprehensive Master Plan has been prepared and is pending approval by the Pakistan Federal Government and that work is in progress to identify the actual extent of the archaeological area of Moenjodaro; 4. Also notes with appreciation the efforts made by the Director-General of UNESCO to address the emergency situation of August 2010 flooding at Moenjodaro through a post-flood assessment mission to the property in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.72, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Expresses its deep regret that the State Party has not submitted a state of conservation report, that it did not submit one to the 34th session, and that therefore no response has been provided to the recommendations of the 2010 reactive monitoring mission; 4. Also expresses deep concern at the potential vulnerability of the property from proposed development, from the absence of effective conservation control in the Old ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.74, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the results of the October 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and the identified threats to the property; 4. Urges the State Party to undertake, in a timely fashion, the measures recommended by the October 2010 mission report, particularly the need to complete and implement the Management Plan and the establishment of the Bukhara World Heritage Steering Committee for the property; 5. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.84, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the progress made by the State Party in civic planning, consultative processes and historic structures documentation; 4. Notes the references in the State Party's report to the development of a general plan, and requests the State Party to provide clarification on the scope and the extent of this plan, particularly whether it covers planning and development of infrastructure as well as conservation and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.85, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the progress made by the State Party in dealing with illegal buildings, the on-going process for the development of a management plan, the carrying out of mitigating measures at the Minh Mang and Khai Dinh Tombs to reduce the impact of the new highway, as well as restricting some major infrastructure projects within the protected area and the buffer zone; 4. Encourages the State Party to consider an extension of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.87, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Expresses its great concern regarding the lack of control for illegal constructions and regrets that a long-term plan has not been established to rectify the violations that have already occurred in order to improve the value and integrity of the property; 4. Also expresses its concern that no progress is being made to introduce a programme for archaeological interventions in case of implementation of major restoration, as well ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.88 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the State Party's efforts to establish clear mechanisms for a coordinated and integrated approach among all decision-making entities and requests the State Party to take the lead in establishing coordination roundtables; 4. Notes with concern that only few recommendations of the 2009 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission have been addressed and reiterates its request to the State Party to take ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7B.89, 33 COM 7B.90 and 34 COM 7B.76, adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party in addition to the 2010 visual impact study; 4. Notes that the Kometgründe project will, if implemented, be carried out according to the request of the World Heritage Committee made at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010) and requests the State Party to inform it of any decisions taken in this ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.78 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the efforts pursued by the State Party in the implementation of the World Heritage Committee decisions and, in particular, the updating of the management plan of the property; 4. Notes the information provided on conservation work planned for the Corpus Christi Catholic Church, but reiterates its request to develop a conservation plan before further major interventions, and in particular the installation of a ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.80, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Also recalling the results and recommendations of the 2006 ICOMOS mission, of the 2007 UNESCO/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and the 2008 ICCROM/ICOMOS expert mission, 4. Notes that the State Party has instituted ongoing monitoring activities for the structural stability of the bridge; 5. Also notes that the redesign of the Ruža Hotel conforms to the decision of the World Heritage Committee adopted at its 34th session ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.81, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the State Party detailed report and the efforts made to launch policy and legislative initiatives intended to enhance protection of the World Heritage property, as well as the strong commitment of the State Party to improve measures in place for the conservation of the World Heritage property; 4. Notes with appreciation that the municipality suspended the issuing of building permits in the protected area and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.97, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Recognises the efforts of the State Party to ensure the protection of the property and the progress being made in the drafting of the site management plan and encourages it to continue these efforts in cooperation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Requests the State Party in consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, to develop a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.82, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Commends the conservation measures which have been taken in relation to the Charles Bridge as well as improvement regarding the legislative protection of Průhonice Park; 4. Expresses its concern that the recommendations from the January 2010 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission have not all been satisfactorily addressed, particularly those applying to limitations on high-rise development, measures ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.95, 32 COM 7B.87 and 33 COM 7B.99 adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Notes progress in developing a comprehensive management plan, in preparing a draft Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, and in establishing a Management Committee for the property; 4. Recommends that the State Party include the key points of the resolution of the 2002 Conference held in Tallinn on "Alternatives to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.83 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on the management and protection of the property and the potential impact of wind turbines on the landscape setting of the property, in particular the introduction of the "area of landscape influence" of Mont-Saint-Michel; 4. Requests the State Party: a) to develop a draft Retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value as the basis for the protection and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.88, 33 COM 7B.100 and 34 COM 7B.85 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Takes note of the extensive and detailed observation, monitoring, analysis and research being undertaken to develop an understanding of the complex micro-biological and climatic dynamics of the Lascaux cave as a means to fully understand the causes of the surface decay; 4. Notes the need for more research into the recently ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.87 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the information provided by the State Party on the progress towards the development of a Master Plan for the property that will set out how its Outstanding Universal Value will be sustained, and how the property might develop in a sustainable way in relation to traffic, noise pollution and demographic and economic developments; 4. Notes the details provided by the State Party for taking forward the spatial planning ...
The World Heritage Committee 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.106, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes that currently, the work on the construction of a large straw-burning power plant in the buffer zone on the outskirts of the Szerencs has been halted; 4. Urges the State Party to use all the means at its disposal to ensure that work does not resume, in the light of the adverse impact on the Outstanding Universal Value identified by the advisory mission and to keep the World Heritage Committee informed; 5. Welcomes the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.107 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the reduction in demolition permits in the so-called Jewish quarter; 4. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on progress being made regarding the 'Street of Culture' initiative that aims to act as a model for sustainable development of this area; 5. Also notes with extreme concern the major development proposal in the buffer zone in Pest adjacent to the property boundary that would result in the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 8D, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with deep concern the collapses that occurred at the property in November 2010 and urges the State Party to address the underlying conditions that have contributed to the collapses, as a matter of urgency; 4. Also notes the conclusions of the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS advisory mission to the property that while the collapses in November 2010 did not compromise the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.110, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of the recommendations by the 2008 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS advisory mission as well as on the preparation of the management plan for the property; 4. Welcomes the finalisation of the management plan for the property and encourages the State Party to fully implement the principles and actions set in the management plan with particular ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 30 COM 7B.86, 32 COM 7B.99 and 33 COM 7B.112 adopted at its 30th (Vilnius, 2006), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 33rd (Seville, 2009) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the information provided by the State Party on the legal framework for protection of the property; 4. Reiterates its request that the new coordination and management Commission begin its regular work as soon as possible, with a clear set of conservation objectives, procedures and a decision-making process which emphasize the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 7B.114, 32 COM 7B.98 and 34 COM 7B.91 adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007), 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Acknowledges the recommendations of the December 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/IUCN reactive monitoring mission; 4. Notes with great concern the designation of an economic development zone within the Kaliningrad region which appears to conflict with the needs of the property, and proposals for large leisure ...
Sites: Curonian Spit
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 8B.30, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Urges the State Party to give further consideration to the revised policy that continues to allow up to 50% of surface area advertising on some scaffold wraps, with a view to stopping the practice and requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre informed; 4. Acknowledges the steps and initiatives being taken to continue to keep open sightlines to and from the city centre against the intrusion of tall ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Takes notes of the information provided by the State Party in its state of conservation report and notes that it is insufficient to fully judge the nature and quality of the work carried out on the rebuilt Pavilion; 3. Also notes that detailed information concerning the proposed road project was not provided in advance, as required by Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines and that the information available on the road project and the maintenance management of the Park Szczytnicki is insufficient to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 8B.39, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the actions being taken to implement corrective measures and encourages the State Party to continue its important conservation programme; 4. Requests the State Party to provide more specific information on the threats to the wall paintings and measures to be taken to address these threats; 5. Recognises the efforts made by the State Party to enact national ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.120, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes notes of the information provided by the State Party in its state of conservation report and expresses its deep concern about interventions carried out by the State Party, as well as a large number of completed and proposed development and construction projects that have not been submitted to the World Heritage Centre in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines; 4. Reiterates its utmost concern ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.105, 33 COM 7B.118 and 34 COM 7B.95, adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Deeply regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report, as well as any boundary modification/clarification as requested by the World Heritage Committee and did not address the World Heritage Committee request to extend the buffer zone of the property; 4. Expresses its grave concern that the need to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.106, 33 COM 7B.119, 34 COM 7B.96 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party for the protection and management of the range of architectural monuments of the property; 4. Reiterates its utmost concern about the lack of follow-up in response to its previous requests, and in particular: a) The delineation and approval of a buffer zone with a view to protect the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.97, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Requests the State Party to implement all the recommendations of the 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, including: a) Establish a series of integrated planning such as urban and development plans, a conservation master plan and a management plan, including tourism strategy, b) Ensure a permanent monitoring of the property with a view of halting and preventing any structural degradation of its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report; 3. Expresses its concern about the apparent lack of monitoring mechanisms and adequate management structures and urges the State Party to develop and implement appropriate legal measures and rules for conservation, restoration and management and use of religious World Heritage properties, as well as to develop a joint management system by establishing a special board including all stakeholders, as well as representatives of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 8B.27, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note of the measures taken by the State Party for the protection of the property, in particular the setting up of a Management Plan Monitoring Committee and the development of a management plan; 4. Requests the State Party to ensure, through the Management Plan Monitoring Committee, the implementation of the management plan and the monitoring of the physical condition of the tower, in particular its relative humidity; 5. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.98, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the technical documentation provided by the State Party concerning the conditions for continuing the tunneling works in progress; 4. Notes the progress on the railway tunnel under Mallorca street, in conformity with the predictions of soil stability and structural vibration at the Sagrada Familia; 5. Also notes the placing of a row of concrete piles to protect the foundations of the Casa Milà, in conditions ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add.2, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.100, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes that an ICOMOS advisory mission was invited by the State Party; 4. Expresses its concern at the potential adverse impact of the Torre Pelli-Cajasol project on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 5. Reiterates its request to the State Party to halt the construction works and reconsider the current high-rise project in order to avoid any possible adverse impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 7B.11, 33 COM 7B.124 and 34 COM 7B.102 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008), 33rd (Seville, 2009) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Recognises the efforts of the State Party in the preparation of the detailed Impact Assessments for the Golden Horn Bridge carried out by international experts on the basis of the ICOMOS guidance and acknowledges with concern the conclusions that the bridge design it had considered at its last session would have a grave and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.103, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the progress made with the adoption of protection laws since the 2009 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and urges the State Party to define a protected historic urban area for central Kiev as soon as possible; 4. Also urges the State Party to strengthen the regulatory and practical mechanisms to ensure the satisfactory implementation of the above laws; 5. Also notes progress with the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the progress made with the development of a Strategic Management Plan and requests that it be sent to the World Heritage Centre immediately upon completion; 4. Acknowledges that major development projects which could adversely affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and specifically the construction of a hotel and construction on the former Franciscan monastery site within the historic centre and buffer ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.127 adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the completion of the "Tower of London Local Setting Study", however, expresses great concern that this study only addresses individual views and a very narrow local setting, while the overall setting of the Tower in relation to the Outstanding Universal Value has not been defined and provided with protection in line with Decision 33 COM 7B.127 adopted by the Committee at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 4. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.128, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes the intention of the State Party to address issues related to the protection of the visual integrity of the property; 4. Notes with regret that specific measures to protect the immediate and wider settings and have not yet been sufficiently developed; 5. Notes with concern that the State Party acknowledges that major developments currently being considered could have a potential impact on the property; 6. Requests the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.129, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the measures taken in the resolution of the road closure and the visitor facilities issues, in particular the approval of the English Heritage Full Planning Application by Wiltshire Council in June 2010; 4. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with details of the location and plans of the proposed visitor centre for evaluation by ICOMOS; 5. Notes that the funding for the implementation of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.132, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009); 3. Notes the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations made by the 2008 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; 4. Welcomes the application of the "Guidance on the Protection of Key Views" and the policy on tall buildings included in the Edinburgh Local Plan in 2010 as important tools for the evaluation of future developments; 5. Acknowledges the efforts undertaken in awareness-raising ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Expresses its extreme concern at the proposed development of Liverpool Waters in terms of the potential impact of its dense, high and mid-rise buildings on the form and design of the historic docks and thus on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 3. Notes that the independent Impact Assessment commissioned by English Heritage clearly sets out the significantly damaging negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property; 4. Also notes that the proposed development is not in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.105, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the required state of conservation report as requested at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4. Notes the results of the November 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and its recommendations and requests the State Party to: a) Finalize the process for the adoption and enforcement of the new Ministerial Decree for the property, b) Secure the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 20 COM VIID.60/61, adopted at its 20th session (Merida, 1996), 3. Regrets the collapse of a portion of the summit of the Cerro Rico Mountain; and expresses its deep concern regarding the event and the dangerous conditions that exist derived from unregulated and unsafe mining practices at the Cerro Rico Mine; 4. Notes with concern that the recommendations made by the World Heritage Centre/ ICOMOS technical mission in 2005, to improve the security and stability of the property, as well ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.106, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the retrospective Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, and requests the State Party to submit it to the World Heritage Centre; 4. Notes the information provided by the State Party and urges it to commence negotiation and the necessary evaluation processes for the definition and implementation of planning tools and regulatory measures to ensure the protection of the ...
Sites: Brasilia
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.134, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts made by the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the property and encourages it to continue such efforts in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, in particular for reaching a final solution to the closure of the illegal road through San Agustín; 4. Urges the State Party to increase its outreach activities with the communities in order to encourage ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.108, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party in improving the management and conservation arrangements for the property and urges the State Party to finalize the approval process for the delimitation of the buffer zone and its regulations as previously requested by the World Heritage Committee; 4. Reiterates its request to submit, by 30 November 2011, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.109, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the progress made by the State Party in improving the overall framework for the conservation and management of the property and encourages the State Party to finalize the approval of the Law of Culture; 4. Reiterates its request to the State Party to finalize the inventory of the built heritage of the property and to develop a holistic conservation plan for it, including regulations and principles for ...
Sites: City of Quito
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.110, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Takes note of the information provided by the State Party regarding the arrangements for implementing the decisions of the World Heritage Committee, recognizes the efforts made by the State Party to ensure the safeguarding of the property and commends the Haitian Institute for the Preservation of the National Heritage (ISPAN) for the work undertaken and the respect of the decisions of the World Heritage Committee; 4. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.137, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding the measures implemented to address the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee, and urges it to submit an official management plan, including provisions for public use and risk management and to secure the necessary resources to ensure its full implementation; 4. Also urges the State Party to develop and implement a comprehensive conservation ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.139, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party regarding progress made in the implementation of recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee and the 2009 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, and requests the State Party to continue with their implementation; 4. Recognizes the efforts made by the State Party in the participatory development of the management plan for the property and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 8B.41, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the information provided on the choice of component sites but considers that this has not yet defined how each of the sites contributes towards the property's Outstanding Universal Value; 4. Also notes the information provided regarding buffer zones for the components under Item 8 of the Agenda of the 35th session of the World Heritage Committee (Document WHC-11/35.COM/8B); 5. Further notes the information provided by ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.112, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the efforts undertaken by the State Party to address the state of conservation of the property; 4. Expresses its deep concern regarding the state of conservation of the property, in particular the significant and accelerated degradation of the historic fabric which directly impacts on its Outstanding Universal Value; 5. Also notes the progress made by the State Party to implement previous Committee decisions; 6. Takes ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.113, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Notes the efforts made by the State Party to improve the state of conservation of the property, in particular in aspects referring to the management system and the suspension of the implementation of the Cinta Costera project within the property; 4. Also notes the commitment of the State Party to submit for evaluation of the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, all projects, studies and proposals related to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.144, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Acknowledges that plans for the construction of a National Airport in Nasca have been discarded; 4. Recognizes the efforts of the State Party in working to finalize outstanding issues related to the property's management and recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee, and urges it to finalize the property's management plan and to secure the necessary resources for its full implementation; 5. Requests the State Party ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.114, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the efforts made to ensure the conservation of the property, and encourages it to continue with this work in co-operation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4. Notes the submission of the risk preparedness plan, however expresses its concern that the developed plan does not include provisions to address threats and vulnerabilities derived from ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.115, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of prior decisions by the World Heritage Committee and requests it to fully set up the Coordinating Board and Technical Secretariat for the management of the property and to secure the necessary resources for their effective operation; 4. Notes the results of the December 2010 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission and ...
Sites: City of Cuzco
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.116, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the actions being taken in the property, and requests the State Party to fully implement the recommendations of the 2010 World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission, with special attention to: a) Developing appropriate guidance tools and precise policies for interventions at the Historic Centre both for decision-makers and for property owners, b) ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 33 COM 7B.146, adopted at its 33rd session (Seville, 2009), 3. Takes note that the State Party submitted a state of conservation report after the established deadline and, therefore, it could not be considered by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies for the present session; 4. Urges the State Party to finalize the process for the development of a comprehensive participatory management plan for the property, including zoning and land use regulations and to submit by 1 ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Documents WHC-11/35.COM/7C, WHC-11/35.COM/INF.7C and WHC-11/35.COM/7B, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7C, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Thanks the States Parties of Senegal and Australia for the organization of the Expert meeting on the global state of conservation challenges for World Heritage properties (Dakar, Senegal, 13-15 April 2011); 4. Endorses the recommendations of the Expert meeting on the global state of conservation challenges for World Heritage properties presented in Document WHC-11/35.COM/INF.7C and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/8A, 2. Stressing the importance of the process of revision and updating of Tentative Lists, in conformity with Article 11 of the World Heritage Convention and in consistency with the established World Heritage List; 3. Takes note of the Tentative Lists presented in Annexes 2 and 3 of this Document.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/8B, 2. Approves the proposed name change to James Island and Related Sites as proposed by the Gambian authorities. The name of the property becomes Kunta Kinteh Island and Related Sites in English and Île Kunta Kinteh et sites associés in French.
top