Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








8194 Decisions
146 Resolutions
By Year
Spissky Hrad and its associated cultural monuments 620rev Slovak Republic C(iv) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criterion (iv).
Banská Stiavnica 618rev Slovak Republic  C(iv)(v) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iv) and (v).
Archaeological ensemble of Merida 664 Spain C(iii)(iv) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iii) and (iv).
Royal Monastery of Santa Maria de Guadalupe 665 Spain C(iv)(vi) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iv) and (vi).
The Route of Santiago de Compostela 669 Spain  C(ii)(iv)(vi) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (ii), (iv) and (vi). In response to a suggestion made by the Bureau, the Delegate of Spain informed the Committee that Spain would like to maintain the already inscribed sites of Santiago de Compostela and Burgos Cathedral as separate properties on the World Heritage List in view of their individual and particular uniqueness. The Delegate of France informed the Committee that discussions were in progress between Spain and France on a joint ...
Birka and Hovgarden 555 Sweden C(iii)(iv) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iii) and (iv).
Engelsberg Ironworks 556rev     Sweden C(iv) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criterion (iv).
Coro and its Port 658  Venezuela C(iv)(v) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iv) and (v). The Delegate of Germany pointed out that a comparative study on colonial towns in Latin America would be appropriate to obtain a better insight in this matter.
The Complex of Hue Monuments 678 Vietnam C(iv) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criterion (iv), but decided that the inscription would only take effect upon receipt of a Tentative List for Vietnam. By letter of 9 December the Vietnamese authorities provided the requested Tentative List, thus this property was inscribed on the World Heritage List.
Historic Town of Zabid 611  Yemen C (ii) (iv) (vi ) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (ii), (iv) and (vi). The Committee recommended the authorities to strengthen the conservation and management of the site in consultation with ICOMOS.
Fossil Findings of Ipolytarnoc 667 Hungary The Committee recognized the importance of this site on a national level, however it did not meet criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List.
Wild Ass Sanctuary 650 India The Committee was of the view that this site, although important at a national level, did not meet criteria for inclusion on the World Heritage List.
Cedars of Lebanon 646 Lebanon The Committee recognized the sacred importance of the Cedars of Lebanon. However, the nominated site is too small to retain its integrity and therefore the Committee was of the view that it did not meet natural World Heritage criteria. The Delegate of Lebanon informed the Committee that steps were being undertaken for the preparation for a future nomination of a cultural landscape being considered for the Qadisha Valley, including one Grove of the Lebanese Cedars.
Cuc-Phong National Park 673 Vietnam The Committee recognized the importance of the site as the first National Park in Vietnam. The site, however, does not meet the criteria of outstanding universal value under either natural or cultural criteria, and therefore was not recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List. During IUCN's field review of this site it was noted that other forest sites may fulfil the criteria and should be reviewed.
Everglades National Park (United States of America) The Committee's considerations and recommendations regarding the state of conservation of this site are described in Chapter X.2 of this report.
XI.3 After having reviewed the nominations for inscription on the World Heritage List, the Committee reviewed Section I of the Document WHC-93/CONF.002/7. XI.4 The Committee took note of the considerations presented by the Secretariat on this issue and of the results of an analysis of the tentative lists that have been submitted by States Parties over the years. The Committee expressed its concern on the small number of tentative lists that meet the requirements as stipulated in the Operational Guidelines, paragraphs 7 and 8, and confirmed the importance of these lists for planning ...
XI.1 The Committee took note of the advice of the authorities of Australia that the matters raised by the Bureau at its seventeenth session regarding nomination 368bis of the extension of the Central Eastern Rainforests of Australia were in the process of being resolved, and that further advice would be provided to the Bureau at its next meeting.
XI.2 With reference to the nomination of The Historic Centre of Boukhara (Uzbekistan) (602rev), the Committee noted that this property was presented by the former USSR and that it was included in its Tentative List. This Tentative List had not been reconfirmed by the Uzbekistan authorities with regard to cultural properties on its territory. Therefore, the Committee decided that inscription under criteria (ii), (iv) and (vi) would only take effect if and when the Tentative List is presented.
I Sassi di Matera 670 Italy C(iii) (iv) (v) The Committee inscribed the site on the World Heritage List under criteria (iii), (iv) and (v).  
XII.1 The Committee adopted the following budget for 1994 and took note of the indicative budget for 1995. Approved budget for 1994 and indicative budget for 1995 Items 1994Approved US$ 1995 Indicative US$ 1. Preparatory assistance 150,000 150,000 2. Global and Regional thematic studies - meetings 40,000 40,000 3. Monitoring     a) Methodology meetings 65,000   World Heritage Cities 15,000   b) Implementation of programmes:     Latin America & ...
top