Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








230 Decisions
0 Resolutions
Session: 29COM 2005close
By Year
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29 COM/7A.Add,2. Recalling Decision 28 COM 15A.31 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Referring to 171 EX/Decision 18, taken at the 171st session of the Executive Board of UNESCO (April 2005), notably “affirming that nothing, in the present decision, which aims at the safeguarding of the cultural heritage of the Old City of Jerusalem, shall in any way affect the relevant United Nations resolutions and decisions, in particular the relevant Security Council resolutions on the legal status of Jerusalem”,4. Reiterates ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev and the Draft Decision 29 COM 7B.a.Rev, 2. Recognizing the work being undertaken within the framework of the UN Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), and the need for a proper coordination of such work with the activities under the Convention, 3. Takes note of the four petitions seeking to have Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal), Huascaran National Park (Peru), the Great Barrier Reef (Australia) and the Belize Barrier Reef Reserve System (Belize) included on the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Having taken note of the serious threat posed by disasters on the conservation of World Heritage and of the very negative impact that disasters may have on perspectives for sustainable development and poverty eradication of communities living around affected World Heritage properties; 3. Strongly encourages the States Parties to the Convention to act swiftly with a view to integrate concern for heritage within their overall policies and operational mechanisms for disaster mitigation, and to develop ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15A.6, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Commends the State Party of United Republic of Tanzania for positive actions undertaken for the conservation and protection of the property; particularly in redressing tourism pressure, diversifying tourist activities, improving the livelihoods of the local pastoralists and moving to restructure the organization of the NCAA, introducing a new scheme of service and improving the management of the area;4. Requests the State Party to ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.2 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Regrets that the State Party of Cameroon has still not submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, as requested by Decision 28 COM 15B.2, adopted at 28th session (Suzhou, 2004);4. Invites the State Party to sign the ministerial order necessary to the implementation of the management plan, and to communicate to the World Heritage Centre the details of the institution in charge of the protection and the ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.1 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Thanks the State Party of Niger for its decision to forego the construction of a dam and mining activities in the W National Park;4. Encourages Niger, Burkina Faso and Benin to finalise the proposal to extend the W Park into a transboundary property between the three countries.
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.1 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Thanks the State Party of Niger for its decision to forego the construction of a dam and mining activities in the W National Park;4. Encourages Niger, Burkina Faso and Benin to finalise the proposal to extend the W Park into a transboundary property between the three countries.
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.7, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Takes note of the intention of the State Party of Mauritania to draw up a Development and Management Plan (DPM) for the Banc d'Arguin Park (PNBA), whilst inviting the authorities concerned to set up management tools, which will be effective in the long term and form part of an initiative more centred on the "programme" approach;4. Requests the State Party to complete, in coordination with the World Heritage Centre and all the ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.8 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Commends the State Party of Oman for responding to its request and for submitting the management plan for the World Heritage property, as well as for its efforts to conserve the property and the recent progress reported;4. Notes the slow progress in establishing an effective management regime for the property and that the positive intent of the management plan is not being fulfilled due to lack of funding;5. Requests the State ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.9, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004); 3. Reiterates its grave concern on the impacts that the proposed construction of dams could have on the outstanding universal value and integrity of this World Heritage property and downstream communities, and considers that any dam construction within the World Heritage property would provide a case for inclusion of the property in the List of World Heritage in Danger; 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Expresses its serious concern over the current situation at the Keoladeo National Park (KNP) resulting from inadequate release of water to maintain the wetland ecosystem of the property;3. Considers necessary that the required quantity of water is released to the KNP from the Panchana Dam between the months of July and September 2005, and regularly each year thereafter, and that essential repairs are made to the Ghana canal, which carries water from the Ajan Dam to the Park, to avoid water losses during such ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 14B.5, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004); 3. Expresses its deep sympathy to the State Party of Indonesia and the people directly affected by the natural disaster for the loss of life and damage to infrastructure caused by the Indian Ocean tsunami of 26 December 2004 and subsequent earthquakes; 4. Encourages the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to assist the State Party in preparing the emergency action plan for the property as requested by the Committee at its 28th ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.12, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004), 3. Thanks the Solomon Islands National Museum for its coordination and support of the visit to the property by the joint World Heritage Centre / IUCN mission to assess the state of conservation of East Rennell; 4. Commends the local communities for conserving the property during the civil unrest in the country; 5. Expresses its concerns regarding the lack of Government support to the property; 6. Requests that the State ...
Sites: East Rennell
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 27 COM 8C.11, adopted at its 27th session (UNESCO, 2003),3. Commends the State Party of Australia for its continued commitment to address the conservation concerns of the property and for providing a detailed report of ongoing and planned measures;4. Recommends that the State Party take all the necessary measures to further protect surrounding land and improve the buffer zone of the World Heritage property where the opportunity exists and consider adding the Purnululu Conservation ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.10, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004),3. Regrets that the State Party of Indonesia did not respond to the specific issues requested;4. Requests the State Party to urgently submit to the World Heritage Centre, before 1 February 2006, a progress report on the achievements made to follow-up on the recommendations of 2004 IUCN mission, for examination by the Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.18, adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004), 3. Notes with satisfaction that the State Party of Philippines has begun plans and sought international assistance to organise a Sub-regional Workshop on Illegal Fishing in the Sulu Sea; 4. Urges the State Party to work with the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to further develop and refine these plans for the Workshop and submit a reformulated international assistance request so that the Chairperson of the Committee may ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.19 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004), 3. Noting that measures were taken by the authorities to mitigate the negative impacts of the road construction, including education and awareness-raising programmes; waste collection measures; tree planting; embankment and ditch system construction; planting of grass; maintenance of the naturally recovered vegetation; law enforcement and involvement of local people in forest protection, 4. Further noting that other ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev, 2. Recalling its Decision 28 COM 15B.20 adopted at its 28th session (Suzhou, 2004), 3. Commends the States Parties of Poland and Belarus for the preliminary efforts undertaken in attaining joint co-management of the property and inclusive  consultative processes; 4. Encourages both States Parties to continue the ongoing efforts on joint cross border initiatives; 5. Urges the States Parties of Belarus and Poland to adopt open participatory processes that involve all relevant stakeholders; 6. Requests ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev,2. Commends the State Party of Canada for providing a report clarifying the status of the Cheviot Mine near Jasper National Park and beetle infestation throughout the mountain ranges of British Columbia;3. Welcomes the efforts by the State Party to enact mitigation measures against potential damage by the beetle infestation;4. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre by 1 February 2006, an updated report on the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks, including the outcome of the legal process on ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined Document WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev and the Draft Decision 29 COM 7B.17.Rev,2. Taking note of the report presented by IUCN during the 29th session (Durban, 2005) of the IUCN monitoring mission to the property which took place on 13 June 2005 with the effective support of the Ministry of Natural Resources, Hydro-Quebec, Quebec Parks and Parks Canada,3. Notes the following key findings of the mission:a) the drilling in the buffer zone of the property was clearly an error as a result of a lack of awareness of the existence of the buffer zone and ...
top