The World Heritage Centre has developed a project with the objective to conduct an overall reflection and study on the image/perception of the List of World Heritage in Danger and to propose approches aiming at reversing this negative perception and highlight both the implications and the benefits of this fundamental component of the Reactive Monitoring framework.
Since a couple of years, debates at the World Heritage Committee highlight that the List of World Heritage in Danger (LWHD) is unfortunately often perceived as a sanction, and that, inscription on this List is not perceived in the same way by all States Parties concerned; with some applying for the inscription of a property to focus international attention on its problems and to obtain expert assistance in solving them while others wishing to avoid such inscription by all means.
The Committee decided to formally address this issue and hence called for a “better understanding of the implications and benefits of properties being inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, and to develop appropriate information material in this regard with a view to overcome the negative perceptions of the List of World Heritage in Danger” (Decision 40 COM 7).
To address this issue, the World Heritage Centre developed a project with the objective to conduct an overall reflection and study on the image/perception of the LWHD. A contractor with expertise in strategic marketing, branding and communication has been identified (“Beyond Borders Media”) and tasked with investigating the reasons why a negative perception overshadows the LWHD, as well as suggesting ways forward to change the mindset towards the LWHD into a more positive perception. This activity has benefitted from the generous support of the State Party of the Norway (see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/partners/381/).
The methodology for the independent Study included data and information gathering through a desk review of statutory texts, working and information documents, webpages and Committee’ decisions as well as prior studies on the topic. The Contractor also undertook a total of 30 in-depth interviews with the Secretariat, the Advisory Bodies, State Party and civil society representatives, Committee members and experts, as needed, ensuring as far as possible that the interviewees form a geographically and gender balanced group, also representing all categories of properties (cultural/natural). An online survey was also addressed to all stakeholders of the Convention, in which 220 respondents took part.
The Study seeks to understand the dynamics of the List of World Heritage in Danger through the eyes of its fans and detractors alike and provide a snapshot of how it is being understood, misunderstood, used, underused, appreciated, or criticized. The overall goal is to use this knowledge to launch a new beginning for this essential element of the World Heritage Convention.
The Study entitled “New Visions for the List of World Heritage in Danger” presents insights into the role and reputation of the LWHD and looks at current discussions on this List, including general attitudes on its role and efficacy, highlighting that, even if as a concept, the LWHD is perceived as an excellent tool for conservation and awareness-raising, it is however clearly facing a range of challenges.
The results presented in this Study echo the many voices and multiple perspectives that have been considered throughout the research process, and reflect their impressions, frustrations, and hopes for the future of the LWHD. The Study concludes with a series of five recommendations on communication approaches to raise the profile of the LWHD as a positive tool, crucial for the protection of the Outstanding Universal Value of World Heritage properties. These recommendations call for “fresh perspectives on dealing with endangered heritage” and emphasize that “the LWHD can be a powerful lever of change, spurring action, starting a conversation, inspiring cooperation and opening up channels of resources and mutual support”.
Full details for each recommendation, with its aims, communication channels, target audiences and approaches, are presented in Section 6 of the Study at http://whc.unesco.org/en/danger/.
The Study was presented to the World Heritage Committee at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023).
In its Decision 45 COM 7.1, reaffirming the need to promote a better understanding of the implications and benefits of properties being inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, the World Heritage Committee took note with appreciation of the thorough study on the perceptions of the List of World Heritage in Danger, together with its recommendations that could form the basis of a communication strategy and thanked the State Party of Norway for its financial support.
The World Heritage Committee also expressed its gratitude to all the stakeholders of the 1972 World Heritage Convention who have actively contributed to this study and further took note with satisfaction of the recommendations formulated in the Study on possible approaches to reverse negative perceptions and to raise the profile of the List of World Heritage in Danger as a positive tool, enhancing understanding and highlighting its importance for the protection of the Outstanding Universal Value of World Heritage properties.
Finally, the World Heritage Committee requested all stakeholders of the Convention to take them on-board and implement them at their level as soon as possible.
This project was made possible thanks to the financial support of the Norwegian Government.
The World Heritage Committee,
Climate Action for World Heritage
Improving the perception of the List of World Heritage in Danger
Enhancing dialogue among States Parties, Advisory Bodies and the World Heritage Centre