Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Administration
Budget
Capacity Building
Communication
Community
Conservation
Credibility of the World Heritage ...
Inscriptions on the World Heritage ...
International Assistance
List of World Heritage in Danger
Operational Guidelines
Outstanding Universal Value
Partnerships
Periodic Reporting
Reinforced Monitoring
Reports
Tentative Lists
Working methods and tools
World Heritage Convention








243 Decisions
0 Resolutions
Year start: 2011close
Session: 36COM 2012close
By Year
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Taking into consideration  Rule 8 (Observers) of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee, 2.  Authorizes  the participation in the 36th session as observers of those representatives of the international governmental organizations (IGOs), international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), non-governmental organizations (NGOs), permanent observer missions to UNESCO and non profit-making institutions having activities in the fields covered by the Convention, who have requested observer participation at the session and as listed ...
The World Heritage Committee,1. Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/3A, 2. Adopts the agenda included in the above-mentioned document.
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/3B, 2.  Adopts the timetable included in the above-mentioned Document.
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined documents WHC-12/36.COM/5A.1, WHC-12/36.COM/INF.5A.1 and WHC-12/36.COM/INF.5A.3; 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 5A adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Takes note with appreciation of the results of the activities undertaken by the World Heritage Centre over the past year in pursuit of its five strategic objectives as presented in document WHC-12/36.COM/5A.1; 4. Further notes the progress report on the implementation of the recommendations by the external auditor on the 2009 audit of the World Heritage Centre presented in ...
1. Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/5A.2, documentWHC-12/36.COM/INF.5A.2 and document WHC-12/36.COM/9A, 2. Recalling Decisions 34 COM 5A and Decision 35 COM 5A respectively, 3. Also recalling Resolution 18 GA 8 adopted by the 18th General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention by which the recommendations of the External Auditor on the Partnership for Conservation Initiative (PACT) were endorsed, 4. Considering that the open-ended working group in charge of producing an implementation plan for the recommendations of the External Auditor will be meeting ...
The World Heritage Committee, Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/5B, Recalling Decision 35 COM 5B adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), Takes note of the reports of the Advisory Bodies (ICCROM, ICOMOS and IUCN) on their activities and expresses its gratitude for the efforts undertaken; Welcomes the harmonization of the reports by the Advisory Bodies and the comments on the progress made and gaps identified for the implementation of the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/5C, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 14A.2, 34 COM 5D and 35 COM 5E adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 34th (Brasilia, 2010) and 35th(Paris, 2011) sessions respectively, 3. Welcomes the outcome of the Consultative Meeting on World Heritage and Sustainable Development held in Ouro Preto (Brazil) from 5 to 8 February 2012, takes note of its recommended actions and thanks the State Party of Brazil for having generously hosted this event; 4. Recognizing that the conservation of cultural and natural heritage is of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/5D, 2. Recalling Decisions 32 COM 10, 32 COM 10A and 34 COM 5F.1 adopted at its 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) and 34th (Brasilia, 2010) sessions respectively, 3. Welcomes the progress report made on the implementation of the World Heritage Thematic Programmes; 4. Requests the World Heritage Centre, in collaboration with the Advisory Bodies, and with the support of interested States Parties to continue its efforts to implement the activities foreseen under each of these programmes in 2012-2013; 5. Expresses its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/5E, 2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 5F.2 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), 3. Welcomes the finalization of the new and inclusive Programme on World Heritage and Sustainable Tourism and notes with appreciation the participatory process for its development, objectives and approach towards implementation; 4. Also welcomes the contribution of the Steering Group comprised of States Parties representatives from the UNESCO Electoral Groups, the World Heritage Centre, the Advisory Bodies ...
1.   Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/6, 2.   Recalling Decisions 34 COM 9C and 35 COM 6 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010) and 35th session (Paris, 2011) respectively, 3.   Welcomes the establishment of two new category 2 centres related to World Heritage in Spain and Italy, as well as the progress made by all category 2 centres towards the establishment of their system of governance and the implementation of their activities; 4.   Thanks the International Research Centre on the Economics of Culture and World Heritage Studies (Turin, Italy) for having hosted the second ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.1, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Thanks the State Party for the confirmation of its political willingness to restore the property, but notes the absence of concrete information in the State Party report, on the implementation of the corrective measures and their impact on the safeguarding of the property; 4.   Expresses its strong concern regarding the continuation of insecurity problems in the property due to the ...
1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.2, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Notes with satisfaction the normalisation of the socio-political situation of the country and the restoration of State authority over the property as reported by the State Party; 4. Reiterates its utmost concern that the Outstanding Universal Value of the property appears to be seriously compromised and considers that a census of the populations of key species and indications of poaching and other threats such as the straying of cattle ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.3, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Regrets that the State Party of Guinea did not submit a conservation report on the property as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session, making it impossible to assess the progress of the implementation of corrective measures; 4. Welcomes with satisfaction the dynamics of trans-boundary management of the property as practised by the State Parties of Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire and Liberia, and reiterates its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.4, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Extends its deepest condolences to the families of guards killed during operations conducted to protect the property, since its last session; 4. Welcomes with satisfaction the significant progress reported by the State Party in the implementation of certain corrective measures, including the resumption of control of 80% of the Park, despite the persistence of pockets of militias in the Park, diminishment ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.22, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Recalling the relevant provisions on the protection of cultural heritage including the four Geneva Conventions (1949), the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of 1954, the Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage of 1972, the inscription of the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls at the request of Jordan on the World Heritage List ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalls Decision 35 COM 7A.5, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Welcomes with satisfaction the important progress reported by the State Party in the implementation of some corrective measures, notably the evacuation of the armed groups from the property and the increase in the area of surveillance, the closure of a large number of artisanal mining operations in the property and the resolution of illegal occupations in Bitale; 4. Notes with concern the absence of progress accomplished ...
1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling previous UNESCO decisions, including 176 EX/Special Plenary Meeting/Decision, Decision 34 COM 7A.20 of the World Heritage Committee adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), and 187 EX/Decision 5 relating to the Ascent to the Mughrabi Gate in the Old City of Jerusalem, 3. Also recalling the relevant provisions on the protection of cultural heritage, including in the four Geneva Conventions (1949), the relevant provisions of the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.6, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Notes with satisfaction the progress in the implementation of the corrective measures but requests the State Party to provide a more detailed and quantitative report to enable the Committee to assess the reported progress; 4. Regrets that the persistence of pockets of armed groups continue to render difficult the  management of the property and especially the anti-poaching efforts, and that the lack of mapping equipment continues ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.7, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Notes with satisfaction the recent progress in the security of the property and progress accomplished by the managers and their partners concerning the participatory management of the natural resources, notably the delineation of the property; 4.   Expresses its deep concern regarding the conclusion of the reactive monitoring mission that the Outstanding Universal Value of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalls Decision 35 COM 7A.8 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Extends its deepest condolences to the families of guards killed during operations conducted to protect the property, since its last session; 4.   Warmly welcomes the efforts of the State Party and in particular the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation, in implementing the corrective measures; 5.   Expresses its strong concern with regard to the reports indicating an ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.9 , adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Commends the State Party for the reported efforts to strengthen the management effectiveness of the property as well as progress in the implementation of several recommendations on previous monitoring missions as well as the reported significant increases in populations of the endangered Walia ibex and Ethiopian wolf but notes that progress should continue to be made to resolve the ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.10, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Welcomes the efforts by the State Party to start implementing the corrective measures, in particular the inscription of ebony and rosewood species under Appendix III of CITES, and the reported halting of all illegal logging in Masoala National Park; 4.  Considers that to address the issue of illegal logging in a sustainable way, it is important to tackle the governance of the forest sector ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.11, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets the absence of  precise information in the reports submitted by the State Party on the implementation of the corrective measures and their impact, in response to the decisions of the Committee; 4.   Reiterates its deep concern concerning the deterioration of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property based on reports received indicating that several species of ...
1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A,  2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.12, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Reiterates its concern about the alarmingly low densities of wildlife in the property, as indicated by the reported survey results, which reflect a significant deterioration of the property’s Outstanding Universal Value; 4.   Welcomes the actions undertaken by the State Party in the development of a management framework for the property and in strengthening cooperation with local communities and other ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.16, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Acknowledges the progress reported by the State Party, and urges the State Party to continue increasing the efforts to combat illegal activities within the property; 4.   Notes the on-going process of updating the Action Plan, and requests the State Party to urgently reactivate the Inter-ministerial World Heritage Working Group which would facilitate its ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.14, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Welcomes the significant effort of the State Party to refine and quantify the indicators developed for the Desired state of conservation for removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger and to connect them to the 14 corrective measures allowing a comprehensive report on progress; 4.   Expresses concern about the results of the assessment of the effects of exotic ...
1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.15, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Expresses its utmost concern that the State Party has not made a clear and unequivocal commitment to eliminate oil concessions granted within the boundaries of the property, which threaten to seriously and irreversibly affect its Outstanding Universal Value if activated, and reiterates its position that oil exploration and extraction are incompatible with World Heritage status; 4.   Notes with extreme concern that ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.         Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.         Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.16, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.         Endorses the recommendations expressed by the reactive monitoring mission; 4.         Welcomes the efforts of the State Party to implement the interim corrective measures adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session, in ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7B.31, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Welcomes the progress made towards the relocation of illegal occupants from within the property, and also the establishment of an inter-ministerial judicial group to lead the land tenure regularization process for indigenous groups living in and around the property; 4.  Takes note of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the proposed Patuca III hydroelectric project on the Patuca ...
1.   Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.17, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in the implementation of the adopted corrective measures, and in the reconstruction of the Muzibu Azaala Mpanga in particular, and urges it to continue its efforts in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies; 4.   Also welcomes the support by the Government of Japan through UNESCO to address the fire fighting and disaster risk management ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.18, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Notes with satisfaction the efforts made for the development and resourcing of the Integrated Preservation project including its three components at the ruins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Songo Mnara and requests the State Party to submit the fully developed World Monuments Fund project, including technical specifications for interventions, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, prior to ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.19, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit a report as requested and expresses its concern about the lack of information on the state of conservation of the property; 4. Urges the State Party to take all necessary steps to implement the corrective measures adopted at its 31st session in 2007; 5.  Requests the State Party to submit a revised timeframe, previously announced for 2010, to complete ...
Sites: Abu Mena
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.20, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Regrets that the State Party did not submit the report on the state of conservation of the property as requested; 4. Takes note of the results of the reactive monitoring mission of June 2011, encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations and urges it to prioritize the implementation of the following actions: a)  Develop baseline documentation to carry out a comprehensive condition ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.21, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Regrets that the State Party did not submit the report on the state of conservation of the property as requested; 4.   Takes note of the results of the reactive monitoring mission of June 2011, encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations and urges it to prioritize the implementation of the following actions: a)  Develop baseline documentation, including ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.    Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A Add, 2.    Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.23, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.    Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the actions being taken to implement some of the corrective measures and urges the State Party to continue its work on all the corrective measures adopted at its 31st session (Christchurch, 2007); 4.    Calls upon the international community to support financially and technically the implementation ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7A.20, 34 COM 7A.20 and 35 COM 7A.24 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 34th (Brasillia, 2010) and 35th (UNESCO, 2011) sessions respectively, 3.   Regrets that the State Party did not submit a state of conservation report, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011); 4.   Takes note of the planned Third expert working group meeting for Jam and Herat to take place in tentatively September 2012 and ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.  Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.  Regrets that no report was submitted by the State Party, as requested by the World Heritage Committee at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011); 4.  Notes the production of the first Annual Progress Report (June 2010-June 2011) for the Preparation of a Management Plan for Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley; 5.  Urges the State Party to finalise the Management Plan ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3. Welcomes the progress made by the State Party in the implementation of the corrective measures for the property and calls upon the international community to continue to support these efforts; 4. Takes note of the results of the October 2011 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission; 5. Requests the State Party to implement the mission’s recommendations, in particular to: a)  Systematically ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.27 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Commends the State Party for the significant efforts made to address the threats to the property and to implement the corrective measures and therefore considers that the Desired state of conservation has been met; 4.   Takes note of the results of the 2012 reactive monitoring mission to the property and encourages the State Party to implement its recommendations, in ...
The World Heritage Committee,  1. Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2. Recalling Decisions 33 COM 7A.24, 34 COM 7A.26 and 35 COM 7A.29 adopted at its 33rd (Seville, 2009), 34th (Brasilia, 2010) and 35th (UNESCO, 2011) sessions respectively, 3. Commends the State Party for its significant efforts to address the threats that led to the inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger and the implementation of the corrective measures; 4. Considers that, in line with the state of conservation report and the findings of the 2011 joint World ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.  Decides exceptionally to adjourn the debate on the agenda item until its next 37th ordinary session of the World Heritage Committee (2013).
The World Heritage Committee, 1.      Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add, 2.      Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.30 adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.      Acknowledges the detailed information provided by the State Party on the progress made to implement the corrective measures and urges the State Party to continue its work on all the corrective measures adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010); 4.      Also urges the State Party to define the buffer zone of ...
The World Heritage Committee, 1.            Decides to adjourn the debate on this agenda item until its next ordinary session.
The World Heritage Committee, 1.   Having examined Document WHC-12/36.COM/7A, 2.   Recalling Decision 35 COM 7A.32, adopted at its 35th session (UNESCO, 2011), 3.   Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party on the implementation of identified corrective measures, and urges it to continue its efforts to secure the required resources for their full implementation; 4.   Notes that the International Expert Meeting is scheduled for October 2012, and requests the State Party to take this opportunity to develop a draft Desired state of ...
top