i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

28
Reports
18
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:1985close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1985 Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, Yes
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1984 Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, No
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1983 Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, No
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 1982 Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, No
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park montenegro Montenegro 1985 Water infrastructure, No
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park montenegro Montenegro 1984 Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 1985
Other Threats: Fire
No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1985 Illegal activities, Yes
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1984 Illegal activities, No
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef australia Australia 1985 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park tunisia Tunisia 1985 Air pollution, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, No
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park argentina Argentina 1985 Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Land conversion, No
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
1984 Financial resources, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
natural and culturo-historical region of kotorNatural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor montenegro Montenegro 1979 Earthquake, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1985 Management systems/ management plan, Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1984 Management systems/ management plan, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1983 Management systems/ management plan, No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 1982 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Housing, Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Loss of historical authenticity
No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 1985 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey benin Benin 1985 Storms, No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 1985 Civil unrest, No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 1984 Civil unrest, No
tai national parkTaï National Park cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire 1985 Crop production, Illegal activities, Mining, No
tai national parkTaï National Park cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire 1984 Crop production, Illegal activities, Mining, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1984 Water infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1983 Water infrastructure, No
wieliczka and bochnia royal salt minesWieliczka and Bochnia Royal Salt Mines poland Poland 1984 Relative humidity, Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Gradual deterioration
No
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park canada Canada 1985 Water infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.