i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

88
Reports
28
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: Collapsing monuments due to lack of maintenance
States Parties: China
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: China
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
Other Threats: vegetation with roots seriously affecting archaeological remains
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
States Parties: Lao People's Democratic Republic
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.