State of Conservation
105
Reports
39
Properties concerned
28
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2014close
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces; |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Estonia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Impact of the transportation of hazardous materials to the Old Town |
States Parties: | Estonia |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Impact of the transportation of hazardous materials to the Old Town |
States Parties: | Estonia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Estonia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | lack of continuous maintenance of the urban fabric |
States Parties
Brazil China Colombia Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Holy See Hungary India Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Morocco Nepal Pakistan Peru Portugal South Africa Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.