State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2017close
Date end:2017close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
archaeological site of panamá viejo and historic district of panamáArchaeological Site of Panamá Viejo and Historic District of Panamá | panama |
2017 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Severe deterioration of historic buildings ; Demolition of urban ensembles and buildings ; Visual impact of a maritime viaduct |
No |
blue and john crow mountainsBlue and John Crow Mountains | jamaica |
2017 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: climate change |
No |
cerrado protected areas: chapada dos veadeiros and emas national parksCerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks | brazil |
2017 | Legal framework, | No |
churches of chiloeChurches of Chiloé | chile |
2017 | Legal framework, | No |
coiba national park and its special zone of marine protectionCoiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection | panama |
2017 | Legal framework, | No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama |
2017 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Fragile state of the property and accelerated degradation by environmental factors, lack of maintenance and limited conservation planning |
Yes |
fray bentos industrial landscapeFray Bentos Industrial Landscape | uruguay |
2017 | Legal framework, | No |
historic quarter of the seaport city of valparaisoHistoric Quarter of the Seaport City of Valparaíso | chile |
2017 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Fire |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2017 | Legal framework,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
2017 | Legal framework, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.