State of Conservation
53
Reports
53
Properties concerned
41
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1992close
Date end:1992close
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/12 |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
Other Threats: | Structural issues, cracks |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community Illegal activities Land conversion Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Civil unrest |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5,WHC-92/CONF.002/7 Rev |
Threats*: | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals Surface water pollution Water (extraction) Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Loss of biodiversity |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Costa Rica Panama |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Management systems/ management plan Oil and gas |
States Parties: | New Zealand |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Major linear utilities Water (extraction) Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Earthquake |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Housing Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Holy See |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources Management systems/ management plan Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production Localised utilities Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Bison herd infected with either tuberculosis and/or brucellosis |
States Parties
Algeria Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Canada Central African Republic Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guinea Holy See Hungary India Italy Lebanon Madagascar Malta Montenegro Morocco Nepal New Zealand Niger Panama Romania Russian Federation Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Management systems/ management plan 18 Housing 8 Illegal activities 7 Financial resources 7 Water infrastructure 6 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 6 Ground transport infrastructure 4 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community 3 Civil unrest 3 War 3 Human resources 3 Legal framework 3 Management activities 3 Localised utilities 2 Input of excess energy 2 Surface water pollution 2 Land conversion 2 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 2 Mining 2 Oil and gas 2 Water (extraction) 2 Earthquake 2 Commercial development 1 Industrial areas 1 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 1 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure 1 Major linear utilities 1 Air pollution 1 Pollution of marine waters 1 Crop production 1 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources 1 Forestry /wood production 1 Ritual / spiritual / religious and associative uses 1 Storms 1 Avalanche/ landslide 1 Erosion and siltation/ deposition 1 Fire (widlfires) 1 Governance 1
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.