State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
15
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2016close
Date end:2016close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
aksumAksum | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3 |
No |
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene | libya Libya | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo | dominican republic Dominican Republic | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
erbil citadelErbil Citadel | iraq Iraq | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Slopes of the archaeological mound non stabilized |
No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation Russian Federation | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
liverpool – maritime mercantile cityLiverpool – Maritime Mercantile City | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | Yes |
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha | nepal Nepal | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
qhapaq nan, andean road systemQhapaq Ñan, Andean Road System | argentina,bolivia (plurinational state of),chile,colombia,ecuador,peru Argentina Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Chile Colombia Ecuador Peru |
2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
sangiran early man siteSangiran Early Man Site | indonesia Indonesia | 2016 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.