State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2011close
Date end:2011close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ashur (qal'at sherqat)Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) | iraq Iraq | 2011 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: fragile mud brick structures |
Yes |
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand Thailand | 2011 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
No |
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg | austria Austria | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park | india India | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
lake turkana national parksLake Turkana National Parks | kenya Kenya | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | Yes |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras Honduras | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2011 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Reduction of elephant populations; |
No |
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama Costa Rica Panama |
2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
three parallel rivers of yunnan protected areasThree Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas | china China | 2011 | Water infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.