State of Conservation
14
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2003close
Date end:2003close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india India | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
antigua guatemalaAntigua Guatemala | guatemala Guatemala | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
bahla fortBahla Fort | oman Oman | 2003 | Commercial development, | Yes |
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds | indonesia Indonesia | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india India | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
giant's causeway and causeway coastGiant's Causeway and Causeway Coast | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck | germany Germany | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla | mexico Mexico | 2003 | Commercial development,
Other Threats: Fire in December 2002 |
No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru Peru | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
imperial palaces of the ming and qing dynasties in beijing and shenyangImperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang | china China | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
meidan emam, esfahanMeidan Emam, Esfahan | iran (islamic republic of) Iran (Islamic Republic of) | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
summer palace, an imperial garden in beijingSummer Palace, an Imperial Garden in Beijing | china China | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india India | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
temple of heaven: an imperial sacrificial altar in beijingTemple of Heaven: an Imperial Sacrificial Altar in Beijing | china China | 2003 | Commercial development, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.