Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1995close
Date end:1995close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Fragility of the abdobe structures
 Yes
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
lake malawi national parkLake Malawi National Park malawi Malawi 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures
 Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1995 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top