State of Conservation
13
Reports
13
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1985close
Date end:1985close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary | senegal Senegal | 1985 | Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, | Yes |
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park | montenegro Montenegro | 1985 | Water infrastructure, | No |
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands | ecuador Ecuador | 1985 |
Other Threats: Fire |
No |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1985 | Illegal activities, | Yes |
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef | australia Australia | 1985 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia Tunisia | 1985 | Air pollution, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Subsistence hunting, Water (rain/water table), Water infrastructure, | No |
los glaciares national parkLos Glaciares National Park | argentina Argentina | 1985 | Housing, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Land conversion, | No |
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area | united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania | 1985 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria Bulgaria | 1985 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey | benin Benin | 1985 | Storms, | No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 1985 | Civil unrest, | No |
tai national parkTaï National Park | cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire | 1985 | Crop production, Illegal activities, Mining, | No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada Canada | 1985 | Water infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.