State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
comoe national parkComoé National Park | cote d'ivoire |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: diminishing protection |
Yes |
garamba national parkGaramba National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve | honduras |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
salonga national parkSalonga National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex and Simien FoxSoil deterioration. |
Yes |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | No |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo |
2005 | Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.