Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient city of nessebarAncient City of Nessebar bulgaria Bulgaria 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
cultural landscape of sintraCultural Landscape of Sintra portugal Portugal 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces
No
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo panama Panama 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of a maintenance programme, as well as polluted water
No
historic centre of bruggeHistoric Centre of Brugge belgium Belgium 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost russian federation Russian Federation 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
No
old bridge area of the old city of mostarOld Bridge Area of the Old City of Mostar bosnia and herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Cracks appearing on the surface of the old bridge.
No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2010 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top