Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 1999close
Date end:1999close
Threats* : Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreationclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
alhambra, generalife and albayzin, granadaAlhambra, Generalife and Albayzín, Granada spain Spain 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: State of dilapidation of the Puerta Elvira area
No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
historic centre (old town) of tallinnHistoric Centre (Old Town) of Tallinn estonia Estonia 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur egypt Egypt 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones
 No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No
taxilaTaxila pakistan Pakistan 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation,
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
 No
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 1999 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top