State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1998close
Date end:1998close
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.3,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.3 Rev,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3A,WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Mining |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Mining |
States Parties
Australia Canada Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Guinea Peru Russian Federation SpainThreats
Mining 11
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.