State of Conservation
68
Reports
68
Properties concerned
48
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1999close
Date end:1999close
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties
Albania Argentina Australia Bangladesh Belarus Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador France Georgia Germany Ghana Guatemala Guinea Honduras India Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mozambique Nepal Niger Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Spain Sri Lanka Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.