State of Conservation
28
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2001close
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
States Parties
Argentina Democratic Republic of the Congo Montenegro Russian Federation United States of AmericaThreats
Housing 28
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.