State of Conservation
107
Reports
22
Properties concerned
39
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1998close
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Dredging of the Pashur River |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Belize Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Congo Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Ecuador France Gabon Germany Guinea Honduras Indonesia Italy Montenegro Nepal Niger North Macedonia Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Switzerland Uganda Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania United States of AmericaThreats
Forestry /wood production 107
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.