State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Alterations of the hydrological regime; Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movements |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | Fencing along the international border |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5 |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
Other Threats: | climate change |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Forestry /wood production |
States Parties
Albania Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Belize Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic China Congo Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Ecuador France Germany Greece Guinea Honduras Indonesia Italy Jamaica Japan Malawi Montenegro Nepal New Zealand Niger North Macedonia Peru Poland Romania Russian Federation Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Switzerland Togo Uganda Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania United States of AmericaThreats
Forestry /wood production 132
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.