State of Conservation
280
Reports
69
Properties concerned
43
States Parties with SOC reports
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Numerous ruins in the city that in danger of collapse in the event of an earthquake |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties
Algeria Brazil Chad Chile China Colombia Czechia Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Holy See Hungary India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal New Zealand Oman Pakistan Peru Portugal Romania South Africa Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.