Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

33
Reports
33
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose Air transport infrastructureclose Ground transport infrastructureclose Marine transport infrastructureclose
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: France
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Viet Nam
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces;
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: India
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
States Parties: Estonia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Impact of the transportation of hazardous materials to the Old Town
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: lack of continuous maintenance of the urban fabric
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Japan
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Uruguay
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Marine transport infrastructure
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B,WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings, as well as the effect of heavy traffic on historic buildings
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Marine transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Fire
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top