English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
53
Reports
14
Properties
13
States Parties
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2016
Document Source:  WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2003
Document Source:  WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2018
Document Source:  WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2017
Document Source:  WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2007
Document Source:  WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties:  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year:  2004
Document Source:  WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Risks of collapse
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2011
Document Source:  WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2010
Document Source:  WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2008
Document Source:  WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Underground transport infrastructure

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.