State of Conservation
32
Reports
32
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2012close
Date end:2012close
| States Parties: |
 Poland
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property of the rebuilt Pavilion |
| States Parties: |
 Panama
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Thailand
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Türkiye
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Underground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas) |
| States Parties: |
 Uruguay
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Kenya
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Colombia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Honduras
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
| States Parties: |
 Iran (Islamic Republic of)
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Underground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Haiti
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Montenegro
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Senegal
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Sri Lanka
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Colombia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Colombia Costa Rica Democratic Republic of the Congo Ethiopia Haiti Honduras Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Montenegro Panama Peru Poland Russian Federation Senegal Sri Lanka Thailand Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
